|
Majority Opinion
|
Per Curiam |
Concurring Opinion
|
Black, J., & Douglas, J. |
Lower Court
|
Ohio Supreme Court |
Lower Court Ruling
|
First Amendment claim denied. |
Oral Arguments
|
Oral Arguments
[Oyez]
|
Lawyers |
Allen Brown (for Appellant) (joined on the briefs by Norman Dorsen, Melvin L. Wulf, Eleanor Holmes Norton & Bernard A. Berkman)
|
Leonard Kirschner (for Appellee) (joined on the brief by Melvin G. Rueger)
|
|
Briefs |
Paul W. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio
|
|
Other |
Collins, Ronald & Skover, David, "What is War? -- Free Speech in Wartime," 36 Rutgers Law Journal 833 (2005)
|
Emerson, Thomas, "First Amendment Doctrine & the Burger Court," 68 California Law Review 422, 437 (1980)
|
Emerson, Thomas, THE SYSTEM OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION (1970), pp. 155-157
|
Gunther, Gerald, "Learned Hand & the Origins of Modern First Amendment Doctrine," 27 Stanford Law Review 719, 755 (1975)
|
Harrold, Marc M, OBSERVATIONS OF WHITE NOISE: AN "ACID TEST" FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT (2005), pp. 61-70
|
Linde, Hans, "'Clear & Present Danger' Reexamined, 22 Stanford Law Review 1163 (1970)
|
Note, "Symbolic Conduct, "68 Columbia Law Review 1091 (1968)
|
Rubenfeld, Jed, "The First Amendment's Purpose," 53 Stanford Law Review 767, 829 (2001)
|
Schwartz, Bernard, "Holmes versus Hand: Clear and Present Danger or Advocacy of Unlawful Action?," 1995 Supreme Court Review 237
|
Smolla, Rodney, SMOLLA & NIMMER ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH (1994), sect. 5.01[2]
|
Stone, Geoffrey, PERILOUS TIMES: FREE SPEECH IN WARTIME (2004), pp. 522-24, 543, 548, 551
|
Tribe, Laurence, AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2nd ed., 1988), pp. 799-802, 848
|
|
Overruling
|
Whitney v. California
|
|
|