First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Maine high court reaffirms ban of state funds for parochial schools

By The Associated Press

Editor’s note: On July 25, the Institute for Justice, representing eight families from Durham, Minot and Raymond, filed an appeal of the Maine high court’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

PORTLAND, Maine — Maine's highest court yesterday upheld — once again — a state law banning state funding of religious schools.

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that restrictions on tuition vouchers continue to be a "valid, constitutional enactment." Justice Robert Clifford dissented, saying a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court ruling invalidated Maine's law.

Yesterday's ruling in Anderson v. Town of Durham marked the second time in a decade that the state high court has upheld a 1983 law, which bans tuition vouchers from being paid to parochial schools.

The lawsuit was brought by a legal advocacy group on behalf of eight families from Durham, Minot and Raymond who sought to use the public funding to send their children to St. Dominic Regional High School, Union Springs Academy and Pine Tree Academy.

It was similar to a 1997 lawsuit brought by five Raymond families who wanted the state to pay for their children's tuition at Cheverus High School, a Roman Catholic school in Portland.

"Obviously we're very disappointed and we're considering whether there are any other steps we can take," including an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, said Richard Komer of the Washington-based Institute for Justice, which brought the suit.

Komer maintained that the 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a voucher program in Cleveland, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, removed the underpinnings for the Maine high court's earlier ruling.

While upholding the current law, the state court left open the door that the U.S. Supreme Court ruling gives Maine lawmakers enough leeway to reverse course if they chose to do so. The Legislature refused to do so when it last addressed the issue in 2003.

An estimated 17,000 Maine students from 145 small towns with no high schools are subject to the voucher program. Towns are allowed to pay for those students to attend a public or a private school, so long as it's not a parochial school.

Before 1980, Maine's tuition statute permitted payment of public funds to approved religious schools. But that ended with an advisory opinion by the attorney general that the practice violated the First Amendment's establishment clause. The current practice began in 1981, and the Maine Legislature made it law in 1983.

However, the U.S. Supreme Court found that Ohio's decision to allow public funding for Cleveland students to attend a religious school did not violate the establishment clause. Later, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston validated Maine's law despite the Supreme Court's ruling.

Yesterday, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that it is both legal to allow school voucher funding for religious schools and that it is also legal, as the state Legislature did, to ban the use of public funds for religious schools.

In this case, the Legislature chose to ban tuition subsidies for students attending religious schools to avoid "excessive entanglement between religion and state," wrote Justice Donald Alexander for the court's majority.

But Clifford disagreed. He said the entire basis for the state's decision to ban tuition vouchers for religious schools was based on the establishment clause, and that reasoning was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Thus, the state should treat all private schools — religious or not — the same to avoid discriminating against religious schools, he said.

"I agree that the state is not required to provide tuition aid to parents who wish to send their children to nonpublic schools. If it does provide such aid, however, it should not be able to exclude private schools that also happen to have a religious affiliation," Clifford wrote.

The Maine Civil Liberties Union praised the court's majority for upholding the ban on taxpayer dollars going to religious schools.

"The Maine Legislature's decision not to fund religious education has been based on an awareness that government interference in religion could lead to real problems," said MCLU lawyer Jeffrey Thaler.

One of the plaintiffs, Jill Guay of Minot, expressed disappointment at the outcome but said she was not surprised. "We had an idea it would go that way," she said.

Guay, who has a daughter entering St. Dominic Regional High School next year, questioned whether the Legislature might change its stance in light of the latest ruling.

"The state has made it pretty obvious that it is going to discriminate against families that choose religious schools over public schools," she said.

Supreme Court turns away Maine vouchers case
Eight families had asked justices to review program that allows students in small towns to attend public or private high schools of their choice but not religious institutions. 11.27.06

Maine high court revisits voucher question
Parents in towns with no public high school want state to cover tuition for their children to attend religious schools. 03.27.05


Maine's high court rules that state doesn't have to fund religious education

Parents had challenged rural school-choice program as a violation of their religious liberties because it wouldn't support sectarian schooling. 04.28.99

Parents lose bid to get town to pay for kids' parochial school
Maine high court rejects appeal from parents who claimed that subsidy from town funds didn't violate state law barring use of public money for religious education. 07.06.08

Supreme Court's voucher ruling dramatic, not surprising
As foreseeable as outcome might have been, the feeling was inescapable, among dissenters and others, that the Court crossed a new threshold. 06.28.02

1 First Amendment case on Court docket
2006-07 Supreme Court term preview by Tony Mauro Case concerns whether states may prohibit labor unions from using non-union employee dues for political activities without consent. 09.26.06

Vouchers pass constitutional test, but are they good for America?
By Charles C. Haynes We need to decide what kind of educational system will enable our religiously diverse nation to live with our deepest differences. 07.07.02


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 00:23:00
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links