|
|
|
Majority Opinion
|
Rehnquist, J. |
|
Concurring Opinion
|
Blackmun, J. (concurred in result) |
|
Dissenting Opinion
|
Brennan, J. (joined by Marshall, J.) |
|
Lower Court
|
9th Circuit |
|
Lower Court Ruling
|
First Amendment claim sustained |
|
Oral Arguments
|
Oral Arguments
[Oyez]
|
| Lawyers |
David Utevsky, Jack D. Novik, & Burt Neuborne for ACLU
|
Michael A. Bamberger for American Booksellers Association
|
|
| News Stories & Commentary |
|
| Other |
Chemerinsky, Erwin, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLES & POLICIES (2nd ed., 2002), sect. 11.3.4.4
|
Farber, Daniel & Frickey, Philip, "The Jurisprudence of Public Choice," 65 Texas Law Review 873 (1987)
|
Lowey, Arnold H., "Obscenity, Pornography & First Amendment Theory," 2 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 471 (1993)
|
Note, "The Content Distinction in Free Speech Analysis After Renton," 102 Harvard Law Review 1904 (1989)
|
Prygoski, "The Supreme Court's Secondary Effects Analysis in Free Speech Cases," 61 Cooley Law Review 1 (1989)
|
Stone, Geoffrey, "Content-Neutral Restrictions," 54 University of Chicago Law Review 46 (1987)
|
Tribe, Laurence, AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2nd ed., 1988), p. 939
|
|
|
|
