First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Study: 1% of Web sites are sexually explicit

By The Associated Press
11.15.06

PHILADELPHIA — About 1% of Web sites indexed by Google and Microsoft are sexually explicit, according to a U.S. government-commissioned study.

Government lawyers introduced the study in court this month as the Justice Department seeks to revive the 1998 Child Online Protection Act, which required commercial Web sites to collect a credit card number or other proof of age before allowing Internet users to view material deemed “harmful to minors.”

The U.S. Supreme Court blocked the law from going into effect, ruling it also would cramp the free-speech rights of adults to see and buy what they want on the Internet. The Court said technology such as filtering software may work better than such laws.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged the law on behalf of a broad range of Web publishers, said the study supports its argument that filters work well.

The study concludes that the strictest filter tested, AOL’s Mature Teen, blocked 91% of the sexually explicit Web sites in indexes maintained by Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp.’s MSN.

Filters with less restrictive settings blocked at least 40% of sexually explicit sites, according to the study of random Web sites by Philip B. Stark, a statistics professor at University of California, Berkeley.

“Filters are more than 90% effective, according to Stark,” ACLU attorney Chris Hansen said yesterday during a break in the trial. “Also, with filters, it’s up to the parents how to use it, whereas COPA requires a one-solution-fits-all (approach).”

COPA follows Congress’ unsuccessful 1996 effort to ban online pornography. The Supreme Court in 1997 deemed key portions of that law, the Communications Decency Act, unconstitutional because it was too vague and trampled on adults’ rights. It would have criminalized putting adult-oriented material online where children can find it.

The 1998 law narrowed the restrictions to commercial Web sites and defined indecency more specifically.

In 2000, Congress also passed a law requiring schools and libraries to block porn using software filters if they receive certain federal funds. The high court upheld that law, the Children’s Internet Protection Act, in 2003 in United States v. American Library Association.

Justice Department lawyers Theodore Hirt and Raphael Gomez declined to comment yesterday on Stark’s findings.

Stark prepared the report based on information the Justice Department obtained through subpoenas sent to search engine companies and Internet service providers.

Google refused one such subpoena for 1 million sample queries and 1 million Web addresses in its database, citing trade secrets. A judge limited the amount of information the company had to provide.

Stark also examined a random sample of search-engine queries. He estimated that 1.7% of search results at Time Warner Inc.’s AOL, MSN and Yahoo Inc. are sexually explicit and 1.1% of Web sites cataloged at Google and MSN fall in that category.

About 6% of searches yield at least one explicit Web site, he said, and the most popular queries return a sexually explicit site nearly 40% of the time.

But filters blocked 87% to 98% of the explicit results from the most popular searches on the Web, Stark found.

Stark also said that about half the sexually explicit Web sites found in the Google and MSN indexes are foreign, making them beyond the reach of U.S. law. But he agreed with government assertions that the most popular sites are domestic.

“COPA — right out of the bat — doesn’t block the 50% (posted) overseas,” Hansen said. “So COPA is substantially less than 50% effective.”

Closing arguments in the four-week, non-jury trial before Senior U.S. District Judge Lowell Reed Jr. are expected Nov. 20.

The law, signed by then-President Clinton, requires Web sites to get credit card information or some other proof of age from adults who want to view material that may be considered harmful to children. It would impose a $50,000 fine and six-month prison term on commercial Web site operators that allow minors to view such content, which is to be defined by “contemporary community standards.”

The law has yet to be enforced. The U.S. Supreme Court has twice upheld preliminary injunctions that prevented the government from enforcing the law until a trial to determine the act's constitutionality can be held. (See 2002 ruling Ashcroft v. ACLU and 2004 ruling Ashcroft v. ACLU, II.)

The plaintiffs, including Salon.com, say they would fear prosecution under the law for publishing material as varied as erotic literature to photos of naked inmates at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison.


Update
Federal court strikes down COPA
'Perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections … are chipped away in the name of their protection,' judge says. 03.22.07

Previous
Government, Web sites spar over COPA
As trial opens over law passed in 1998 to protect children from online pornography, plaintiffs tell federal judge that measure is fatally flawed. 10.24.06

Related

Too much sex or too much law?

By Paul K. McMasters Protecting kids from porn and smut — without criminalizing protected speech — can be a complicated legal business. 11.19.06

Indecency online

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 04:52:56
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links