First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
White House urges high court to reinstate Net porn law

By The Associated Press
08.13.03

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to reinstate a law that punishes Web site operators who expose children to dirty pictures and other inappropriate material.

The Court has already sided with the government once this year in its war against online smut, ruling in U.S. v. American Library Association that Congress can require public libraries that receive federal funding to equip computers with anti-pornography filters.

In an appeal filed Aug. 11, Solicitor General Theodore Olson said the filter technology alone is not enough. Children are "unprotected from the harmful effects of the enormous amount of pornography on the World Wide Web," he told justices.

The broader law at issue now — the Child Online Protection Act — requires that operators of commercial Internet sites use credit cards or some form of adults-only screening system to ensure children cannot see material deemed harmful to them. Operators could face fines and jail time for not complying.

Critics contend the law violates the rights of adults to see or buy what they want on the Internet. Olson said the main target was commercial pornographers who use sexually explicit "teasers" to lure customers.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has twice ruled that the 1998 law unconstitutionally restricts speech. In its latest ruling on the law, the 3rd Circuit ruled last March 6 that COPA is "constitutionally infirm." COPA has been on hold since it was challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of artists, bookstores and others who put information on the Web.

The Supreme Court has reviewed the law once. The justices were splintered in their 2002 ruling in Ashcroft v. ACLU that sent the case back to the court in Philadelphia for more consideration of the First Amendment implications.

Jonathan Zittrain, a Harvard Law School professor who specializes in Internet law, said yesterday that the high court would likely struggle again with what to do. "From the government's view, it can't hurt to appeal because it's essentially a roulette wheel," he said.

Zittrain predicted that the government would have a tougher time than it did persuading the high court to uphold the library-filter law (known as CIPA, or the Child Internet Protection Act). The government argued in its filing that the cases are similar.

ACLU associate legal director Ann Beeson says the laws are very different because the 1998 statute involves criminal penalties for people who exercise free-speech rights.

"I would have thought the Justice Department would have better things to do with its time than to defend what is clearly an unconstitutional law," she said.


Update
High court agrees to revisit Net porn law
3rd Circuit has twice struck down COPA, most recently and conclusively last March when it ruled that the law is riddled with problems that make it 'constitutionally infirm.' 10.14.03

Previous
Appeals court again upholds injunction on COPA
3rd Circuit panel's ruling that law is 'constitutionally infirm' comes after Supreme Court sends case back to lower court to resolve free-speech issues. 03.07.03

Related
News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 04:52:58
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links