First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Ind. courtroom-cameras project called inconclusive

By The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS — An 18-month experimental program allowing television cameras in courtrooms to record trials is nearing its end. The verdict: It's a hung jury.

There are few test cases to determine whether televised coverage of trials produces legitimate news, helps to educate the public about the judicial system and treats defendants fairly.

"In lawyer terms, I guess you could say 'insufficient evidence,'" said Kevin Finch, news director of Indianapolis television station WISH. He noted there had been television coverage of only one trial in the state since the program began in July 2006, although a few other proceedings, such as sentencings, have been covered. The project ends Dec. 31.

Finch was among panelists who debated the merits of cameras in the courtroom Nov. 8 at a conference on access to public information. The forum, sponsored by the Indiana Coalition for Open Government, the Indiana State Bar Association and the Hoosier State Press Association, attracted lawyers, journalists and other members of the public.

Indiana law prohibits cameras in courtrooms. But under the pilot program, journalists can bring recording equipment into a courtroom with consent from all parties involved in a case. Defendants and their lawyers typically have not consented.

Marion County criminal court Judge Robert R. Altice Jr. said the solution might be to "take all parties out of the mix and let the judge decide."

The broadcast news industry in Indiana tried that. The Indiana Broadcasters Association in January asked the Indiana Supreme Court to loosen the rules to give trial-court judges sole discretion on whether to permit cameras in their courtrooms, but the justices refused.

Defense lawyers object because they do not want their clients shown on television "on perhaps the worst day of their life," said David E. Cook, chief public defender of Marion County. "I find no common ground when it comes to the best interests of my client."

He said his responsibility was only to his client — not to the community, journalists or even the judge.

"The defense bar answers to no one except what is in the best interests of the client," he said. "You're never going to get us to agree."

Finch noted that a documentary film crew was permitted to record courtroom proceedings involving a juvenile case in 1999. He said Indiana was one of only a few states in the nation that does not allow cameras in the courtroom.

"It is not an impossibility that this kind of thing can work," Finch said. "Because it has worked. Somehow the rest of the country manages to get this done just fine."

Finch was asked whether the presence of television cameras in courtrooms could lead to sensational coverage of trials. Although that is the case in some cities across the county, he said, Indianapolis is not among them.

"This is not a television market where that sort of thing plays well," he said. "That's not what we are putting out in this town."

Changes nixed for Ind. courtroom-cameras project
Press advocates had sought looser rules for test cases in pilot project allowing cameras into local courts; state high court says no. 05.26.07


Ind. to test cameras, audio in courtrooms

Pilot program will allow video, still photography, audio, Webcasts in some courts in response to news media requests. 05.10.06

Bid to open Minn. courtrooms to more cameras sags
Most members on panel advising state Supreme Court on news-media proposal appear primed to recommend against substantial rule changes. 01.18.08

Neb. judges hope cameras will put courts in better focus
State Supreme Court allowing rare peek at murder trial as part of pilot project that could lead to more photo, video news coverage in courtrooms. 05.19.08

Cameras in the courtroom

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 04:58:16
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links