First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
N.J. homeowners groups must recognize residents' free speech

By The Associated Press,
First Amendment Center Online staff
02.08.06

TRENTON, N.J. — A state appeals court panel ruled yesterday that homeowners associations must recognize residents’ rights to freedom of speech under the New Jersey Constitution.

The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel stemmed from a case brought by residents of the private Twin Rivers community in East Windsor, who had sued their homeowners association to be able to put political signs on their front lawns, among other things.

Residents’ “rights to engage in expressive exercises … must take precedence over the [association’s] private property interests,” the panel said in its ruling in Committee for a Better Twin Rivers v. Twin Rivers Homeowners’ Association.

“For the first time anywhere in the United States, an appellate court has ruled that such private communities are ‘constitutional actors’ and must therefore respect their members’ freedom of speech,” said Frank Askin, a Rutgers Law School professor and lead counsel for the Committee for a Better Twin Rivers.

“The Court recognized that just like shopping malls are the new public square, these associations have become and act, for all practical purposes, like municipal entities unto themselves,” Askin said in a statement.

Homeowners in the 10,000-resident Twin Rivers community are also seeking equal access to a newspaper run by the community’s board of trustees and to a community room for meetings for dissidents.

The case had initially been dismissed by a state Superior Court judge. Yesterday’s ruling overturned most of that decision.

“Expressive exercises, especially those bearing upon real and legitimate community issues, should not be silenced or subject to undue limitation because of changes in residential relationships, such as where lifestyle issues are governed or administered by community associations in addition to being regulated by governmental entities,” the ruling said in part.

The appeals panel sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings.

The outcome of the case is of interest to 50 million Americans who live in communities governed by these associations — and whose states “who may emulate what New Jersey has done,” Askin said.


Update
N.J. high court hears dispute over homeowner rules
Plaintiffs object to restrictions on political yard signs, high fees for use of association's community room, and lack of voice in community newspaper. 01.05.07

Related

Welcome to the neighborhood: Now clam up

Homeowners associations flourish, but some residents bristle over restrictive policies on everything from political signs to U.S. flags to paint colors. 07.14.03

Arizona bill aims to make homeowners groups more open
Measure would require association boards to give members broader access to meetings, financial records. 01.17.04

New Fla. town could be governed by Catholic principles
If pizza magnate has his way, Ave Maria will ban abortion, pornography, birth control; civil libertarians call plan unconstitutional. 03.02.06

Political yard signs

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 05:25:00
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links