First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
House votes to raise fines for indecent programming

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Angered by what they called an increasing coarseness on over-the-air television and radio, House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to raise the maximum fine for broadcasters and personalities who air indecent material.

The House yesterday voted to set the maximum fine for both broadcasters and entertainers at $500,000 per indecent incident, up from $27,500 for license holders and $11,000 for personalities.

The bill, H.R. 3717, now goes to the Senate, where the Commerce Committee has also passed legislation raising the maximum indecency fine to $500,000.

“It’s a shame we have to address this issue, but when members of the broadcast industry violate the boundaries of reasonable tolerance, that’s exactly what we’re forced to do,” said House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas. “The House has sent a clear signal to our broadcasters: Enough is enough.”

The vote was 391-22, as members of both parties decried what they said was inappropriate programming during times that children may tune in.

“As the father of two young boys, I share the disgust of parents around the country who are appalled at what is broadcast on our public airwaves,” said Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas. “Parents have a right to expect decent standards for their children.”

Senators went further in their bill, S. 2056, raising the maximum fine to $500,000 and approving provisions to address violence on television and to delay for one year the FCC’s media-ownership rules that allow, among other things, companies to own both newspapers and broadcasting stations in the same market. During that time, the General Accounting Office would look at whether there is a connection between indecency and media consolidation.

If those provisions remain in the Senate bill, then negotiators for both houses will try to work out the differences.

Though introduced in January following FCC Chairman Michael Powell’s call for higher fines, the bill wound up on a fast track to passage after the now-infamous Feb. 1 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with singer Justin Timberlake exposing Janet Jackson’s breast to 90 million viewers.

The FCC said yesterday it had received 530,828 complaints just about the halftime show. Last year, the agency received 240,350 indecency complaints for all programs.

“On Super Bowl Sunday, all of America saw how just how disgusting the industry is intent on being and said collectively they’ve had enough,” said L. Brent Bozell III, president of the Parents Television Council, a conservative advocacy group.

But the American Civil Liberties Union decried the action, saying that freedom of speech could be impinged as broadcasters try to follow a vague definition of what is indecent.

Federal law and FCC rules prohibit over-the-air radio and TV stations from airing offensive material that refers to sexual and excretory functions between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children may be tuned in. There are no such restrictions for cable and satellite TV and satellite radio.

“The vagueness of the language will lead broadcasters and individuals to stifle their remarks and remain silent rather than run the risk of facing an FCC fine,” said Marvin Johnson, an ACLU Legislative Counsel. “In the end, we are left with no clear understanding of just what is ‘indecent’ and worse yet, it seems we will only find out when huge fines are levied on broadcasters or speakers.”

The House bill also requires the FCC to act on indecency complaints within 180 days after they are received, and orders the agency to consider revoking license of any broadcaster found with three indecency violations.

Senate OKs higher fines for indecency
Lawmakers move measure without debate as part of massive defense bill, also approve provision that would delay FCC's media-ownership rules. 06.23.04

Senators echo House panel by endorsing higher indecency fines
But committee diverges from House counterpart by voting to delay FCC's new media-ownership rules until investigators can study relationship between consolidation, indecency. 03.10.04


FCC to broadcasters: F-word out of bounds

Agency overrules its staff, declares that expletive uttered by rock star Bono on NBC last year was both indecent and profane. 03.19.04

Broadcasters to consider code of conduct
Move comes at urging of FCC head, who warned meeting attendees that leaving it to government to set decency standards would 'not only chill speech, it [might] deep-freeze it.' 04.01.04

Anti-indecency efforts prompt broadcast changes
Clear Channel drops Howard Stern after FCC fines company $495,000; meanwhile, some critics say media are not standing up for First Amendment. 04.09.04

FCC head opposes strict sanctions for indecency violators
'I don't think you should reduce something as facile and vague as indecency to clear cause-and-effect consequences,' Michael Powell tells broadcasters conference. 04.21.04

House again votes to hike indecency fines
Lawmakers overwhelmingly approve bill 389-38, rejecting criticism that stiffer penalties would stifle free speech, expression and further homogenize programming. 02.17.05

A closer look at broadcast indecency
Examining what it is, what government regulators, broadcasters are doing about it. 03.23.04

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 07:41:14
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links