First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Washington state bars sale of cop-killer video games to kids

By The Associated Press
05.21.03

OLYMPIA, Wash. — The first state law barring the sale of certain violent video games to children has been signed by Gov. Gary Locke. Video game publishers promised an immediate legal challenge on free-speech grounds.

Under the new law, retailers would face a $500 fine for selling or renting video games depicting violence against police to children under 17.

"We need to get on with ensuring that these kinds of games are not sold or rented out to children," Locke said yesterday.

Video game publishers contended the law is unconstitutionally vague and violates the First Amendment.

State Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, the bill's sponsor, said she specifically tailored the bill to withstand a constitutional challenge.

"I'm proud Washington is the first state to say we have a compelling interest in keeping these ultra-violent games out of the hands of children without their parents' consent," said Dickerson, D-Seattle.

"We intentionally made the law narrow to overcome court challenges by focusing on the compelling state interest of protecting the lives of law enforcement officers, but parents need to know that some of these cop-killer games also feature the murder and torture of women and minorities."

Douglas Lowenstein, president of the Interactive Digital Software Association, in Washington, D.C., declared the law is "not only unnecessary and unconstitutional, but it clearly won't solve the issue at which it's apparently aimed."

Lowenstein said parents, not the state, should police their children's games, which are rated for content by the industry.

"If a child has a Mature-rated game, odds are he got it from Mom and Dad," Lowenstein said. "If the goal is to keep games out of the hands of kids for whom they are not appropriate ... then the answer is to focus on parental education and awareness of the ratings, not to try to turn retailers into parents."

A county ordinance in Missouri that requires children under 17 to have parental consent before they can buy violent or sexually explicit video games or play similar arcade games has been upheld by a federal judge. Video game publishers have appealed that decision, and the case is pending. The St. Louis County ordinance was modeled on a similar Indianapolis law dealing with arcades that was struck down by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.


Update
Retailers, publishers challenge law limiting sales of cop-killer video games
Software industry official points to federal rulings in video-game cases, predicts Washington state ban on sales to kids will fall. 06.06.03

Related

Federal appeals panel: Indianapolis video-game law can't be enforced

Judges overturn lower court ruling, grant arcade industry’s request for preliminary injunction. 03.26.01

Federal judge backs limits on kids' access to violent video games
Court rejects request to throw out Missouri county's ordinance, ruling that the games aren't constitutionally protected forms of speech. 04.25.02

Minnesota lawmakers say 'game over' to kids' violent games
Senate passes measure that would make it illegal for children under 17 to rent or buy adult-rated video games. 05.10.03

8th Circuit strikes down limits on kids' access to violent video games
St. Louis County ordinance required children under 17 to have parental consent before they could buy violent or sexually explicit video games or play similar arcade games. 06.04.03

Arts & First Amendment horizon


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, July 25, 2008 | 09:02:51
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links