First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
 
Scheidler, et al., v. National Organization for Women, et al (doc. #: 04-1244) (2005)  [Findlaw]

Argument Date 11/30/2005
Decided 02/28/2006
Supreme Court Vote 8-0
Note Lyle Denniston (SCOTUS): Filed in 1986, the case brought by abortion rights advocates seeking to use the 1970 RICO anti-racketeering law to stop clinic blockades is back at the Court for the third time.
Supreme Court Ruling Free expression claim sustained (Hobbs Act = inapplicable to abortion clinic protests)
 
IssueWhether the federal Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. 1951) criminalizes only extortion and robbery, or whether it also sweeps more broadly and bans acts of violence or threats of violence that obstruct interstate commerce, whether or not those acts or threats involve extortion or robbery.
 
Case Summary & Additional Resources
Majority Opinion Breyer, J.
Certiorari Granted 06/28/2005
Lower Court 7th Circuit
Lower Court Ruling Free expression claim denied
Lawyers
For Petitioner
Alan Edward Untereiner (Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner, LLP )

Jay Alan Sekulow (American Center for Law & Justice)

For Respondent
Fay Clayton (Robinson Curley & Clayton, P.C.)

Opinion - Lower Court
National Organization of Women, Inc. v. Scheidler (7th Cir., 2005) (per Wood, J.)

News
AP, "High court again considers limits on abortion protests" (12-01-05)

AP, "High court rules in favor of abortion protesters" (02/28/2006)

Other
Medill News Service summary and links

 SEARCH MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links