First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Supreme Court to review 'millionaire's amendment'

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed today to review a campaign-finance law dubbed the millionaire's amendment, which allows candidates to accept larger contributions when their opponents spend heavily from their personal fortunes.

The measure, part of the 2002 campaign-finance law, is meant to help candidates facing wealthy opponents stay financially competitive. Jack Davis, an unsuccessful congressional candidate who is challenging the law, called it a way to "protect well-financed incumbents who wrote the statute."

Once a self-financed candidate's spending hits certain thresholds, a rival relying on fund raising can collect increasingly higher amounts from donors to catch up.

Davis, a Democrat who narrowly lost a congressional race in New York last year, spent more than $2.2 million of his own money in 2006. He lost to incumbent Republican Rep. Thomas Reynolds, 51% to 49%.

Reynolds did not receive increased contributions after Davis reported exceeding the threshold, $350,000 in House races, Solicitor General Paul Clement said in urging the court to dismiss Davis' case.

Davis said the law violated his First Amendment rights because it treated his personal expenditures as suspect and encouraged significant increases in contributed funds to his opponent.

A three-judge court in Washington upheld the provision, saying Davis failed to show that his speech had been constrained by the millionaire's amendment.  It "does not limit in any way the use of a candidate's personal wealth in his run for office," the court said.

The case is Davis v. Federal Election Commission, 07-320.

Justices dissect 'millionaire's amendment'
High court's conservatives appear divided over campaign-finance law allowing candidates to receive larger contributions when wealthy opponents spend heavily from personal fortunes. 04.22.08


'Millionaire' case: new look at campaign finance

By Tony Mauro Appellant argues that allowing opponents of self-financed candidates to receive larger campaign contributions encourages corruption. 01.14.08

Campaign finance horizon

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 16:22:50
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links