First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
Commentary
 
Religion in the workplace: Keep your faith, lose your job
Inside the First Amendment

By Charles C. Haynes
First Amendment Center senior scholar
09.21.03

Your God – or your job. Believe it or not, that’s the cruel choice confronting a growing number of workers in the United States.

Although religious discrimination in the workplace has been a significant problem for years, it has gotten substantially worse since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) receives hundreds of complaints from Muslim Americans – and people mistaken for Muslims – alleging hostility on the job.

EEOC statistics may only be the tip of the iceberg. Many Muslims – especially recent immigrants – are reluctant to file claims. “My boss told me to remove my head covering,” a young Muslim woman told me last week, “or be fired. So I quit my job.” Most incidents like this go unreported.

Muslims in post-Sept. 11 America may be the most frequent target for unfair treatment, but they aren’t alone. Christians, Jews, Sikhs, Hindus and others all experience religious discrimination in the workplace. Even before the terrorist attacks, the problem had gone from bad to worse. From 1992 to 2000, claims to the EEOC concerning workplace religious discrimination rose by 28%.

Sikh Americans, for example, often bump up against work-related grooming and head-covering regulations. Earlier this year, a Sikh police officer in New York sued the city after he was fired for refusing to shave his beard or remove his turban – both required by his faith.

Or consider the Seventh-day Adventists, whose Sabbath is sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. According to the Adventist News Network, each year the Adventist Church receives as many as 1,000 requests for legal help from members fired or disciplined – usually because they can’t work on Saturday.

Note that religious liberty on the job isn’t just for the religious. A number of years ago, an atheist worker fought for (and eventually won) the right to be excused from worship services that his company required all employees to attend.

Lawsuits and complaints about religious discrimination in the workplace ought to be rare in a nation committed to religious liberty under the First Amendment. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as amended in 1972), employers are supposed to “reasonably accommodate” workers’ religious beliefs and practices in the workplace – unless doing so would cause “undue hardship.”

Unfortunately, a 1977 Supreme Court decision in Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Hardison took the teeth out of the law, ruling that even a minimal expense can be considered an “undue hardship.” Since that decision, employers can (and do) refuse religious accommodation for the flimsiest of reasons.

Religious groups haven’t given up. Every year for the past five years, a broad coalition of more than 40 religious and civil rights groups have pushed Congress to pass the Workplace Religious Freedom Act (WRFA). It was introduced in the Senate yet again last spring by Rick Santorum, R-Pa., and John Kerry, D-Mass.

What would WRFA do? It would clearly define “undue hardship” to mean more than the minimal standard set by the Supreme Court. The new standard would require an employer to provide a reasonable accommodation – unless doing so would involve “significant difficulty or expense.”

Critics (mostly business groups) warn that passage of WRFA will burden business owners with higher costs and complicated schedules – and even compromise safety. None of these objections are well-founded. Allowing employees to observe holy days may require more flexibility, but they’ll still have to make up the hours on other days. And nothing in WRFA would change safety-related garb and grooming regulations.

WRFA would put an end to arbitrary and unfair refusals to accommodate sincere religious beliefs and practices. Religious requests for accommodation aren’t based on personal preferences in dress or on a desire to take time off from work. These are claims of conscience – claims based on what the individual believes faith requires.

Will protecting liberty of conscience mean a little more work for employers? Yes. But upholding basic freedoms is what defines (or should define) our nation.

It’s time for Congress to finally pass the Workplace Religious Freedom Act. As Sen. Kerry puts it, the issue is simple: “No worker should have to choose between keeping a job and keeping faith with their cherished religious beliefs.”


Related

Federal judge sides with librarian fired for wearing cross necklace

Kentucky library had argued that dress code was meant to avoid appearance of religious favoritism, protect librarian impartiality. 09.04.03

Firefighter's beard a safety hazard, state court rules
Philadelphia man had argued department's ban on facial hair violates his Muslim beliefs, but judge says safety concerns warrant exception under state religious-freedom law. 09.25.05

Mo. librarian prevails in quest not to work on Sabbath
Connie Rehm was reinstated on judge's order to job she lost in 2003 when library added Sunday hours and she refused on religious grounds. 11.17.06

Company must pay Muslim woman for banning scarf
Federal jury orders Alamo Rent A Car to pay $287,640 for firing employee who refused to remove head scarf she was wearing during holy month of Ramadan. 06.04.07

Workers say Neb. plant harassed, fired Muslims over sunset prayers
Council on American-Islamic Relations has drafted complaint to be filed with federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of Somali employees. 07.23.07

Circuit courts address religion in workplace
By Josh Tatum Four appeals courts find in employers' favor in cases affecting how much employees' religious freedom can be accommodated on the job; a fifth case goes in employee's favor. 04.10.08

Workplace religious liberty

Analysis/Commentary summary page
View the latest analysis and commentary throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 16:50:55
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links