First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Ind. county's adult-bookstore restrictions upheld

By The Associated Press
12.19.07

INDIANAPOLIS — Officials in southern Indiana's Spencer County didn't violate the Constitution when they tried to regulate an adult bookstore, the state appeals court has ruled.

Ruling in Plaza Group Properties v. Spencer County Plan Commission, the Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a county ordinance that said sexually themed businesses must be located at least 1,000 feet away from homes, churches or schools.

The three-judge panel said the ordinance did not unconstitutionally restrict free speech and noted that the owners of the 231 Adult Plaza could have built elsewhere.

"The evidence shows that there are at least 34 alternative sites in Spencer County on which Plaza could operate a sexually oriented business and comply with the 1,000-foot restriction," appeals court Chief Judge John G. Baker wrote in the decision released Dec. 13.

Spencer County officials adopted the ordinance about the same time the business opened in November 2005 at the site of a former truck stop at an Interstate 64 interchange about 35 miles east of Evansville.

Spencer Circuit Judge Wayne Roell upheld the ordinance and found 231 Adult Plaza in violation, but the owners appealed, saying the ordinance violated their First Amendment rights.

The Associated Press left a telephone message seeking comment at the office of Cincinnati attorney H. Louis Sirkin, who has represented the business.

An attorney for the county noted that the ordinance did not keep the site from being used for non-adult businesses.

"We are not there to padlock the doors and say they can't do anything on that site," said Scott Wetherill, attorney for the Spencer County Plan Commission. "If they want to operate a convenience store, gas station or restaurant, they can do that, but it must be in conformity with the zoning ordinance."


Related

9th Circuit upholds city's sex-shop zoning law

Three-judge panel says Spokane, Wash., ordinance is narrowly tailored 'to serve [city's] substantial interest in reducing the undesirable secondary effects of adult stores.' 05.31.04

S.C. high court upholds city's adult-business law
Video store had argued that Charleston ordinance requiring that adult businesses be located in industrial areas was vague and unconstitutional. 10.14.04

Adult bookstores

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 17:22:51
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links