First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Sponsors hold out hope for federal press shield law

By The Associated Press
07.26.06

WASHINGTON — Two Republican co-sponsors of a bill to shield reporters from having to disclose news sources refused yesterday to give up hope for the legislation despite Justice Department opposition and limited time left for congressional approval.

Sen. Richard Lugar and Rep. Mike Pence, both Indiana Republicans, acknowledged yesterday at a National Press Club lunch that their proposed "Free Flow of Information Act" faces an uphill struggle with only a few months left in the 109th Congress.

Nevertheless, Lugar said, "We are still optimistic."

And Pence said that the first hearings by a House committee would be Sept. 14.

The bill still needs approval by a Senate committee and the full Senate, a House hearing, House committee approval, full House approval, probably a conference to resolve differences, final votes on both chambers and President Bush's signature — all before Congress wraps up its session this fall, Lugar said.

And "probably some more compromises" would be necessary, Lugar said, without specifying what they might be. The coalition of news-media companies backing the bill was already shaken by amendments sponsors accepted, particularly in the Senate version.

"We want to be helpful but at some point you risk giving everything away," Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in an interview.

Dalglish said her own group dropped its 35-year-old insistence on an absolute privilege for reporters to withhold source identities in order to support an amendment to the House version that would allow courts to compel reporters' testimony when necessary to prevent "imminent and actual harm to the national security." She didn't see room for more compromise in the Senate version which also could force testimony relating to guilt or innocence, death or bodily harm, eyewitness accounts and unauthorized disclosure of properly classified information.

Just yesterday morning, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., told Pence that the panel's Internet and courts subcommittee would hold a hearing Sept. 14, the first in the House since the bill was introduced last year.

The Senate Judiciary committee held two hearings, spurred by furor over imprisonment of then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller for 85 days until she agreed to tell a federal prosecutor about her sources in the leak of the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame.

A Justice Department representative testified there was no need for the bill. Miller, however, told the panel that without it reporters would no longer get information from government and corporate whistleblowers fearful of losing their jobs.

The Senate panel twice scheduled meetings to act on the bill but failed to get a quorum each time. Lugar said one problem passing the bill was the frequency of news stories — like those that revealed classified government monitoring of financial transactions — that re-ignited controversy even though "they have nothing to do with the merits of our bill."


Update
Bush administration opposes journalist shield law
Deputy attorney general tells Senate panel that proposal to protect reporters from having to identify their sources would encourage leaks of classified information. 09.21.06

Previous
Revised shield-law proposal picks up Senate support
Measure's authors add exceptions that could force reporters to disclose sources if they witness a crime or obtain information deemed secret by law. 05.19.06

Related

Lawyers' group backs federal protection for journalists

American Bar Association rejected supporting shield law 30 years ago, but reconsidered idea after jailing of New York Times reporter. 08.11.05

Senators seek answers in probe of late columnist's records
Judiciary Committee members grow impatient when Justice Department official refuses to comment on FBI investigation into Jack Anderson papers. 06.06.06

Freelancer jailed after refusing to hand over footage
Federal judge sides with prosecutors seeking Joshua Wolf's video from San Francisco protest in which anarchists were suspected of vandalizing a police car. 08.02.06

Chronicle reporters told to testify in Bonds leak case
Federal judge says his hands are tied by 1972 ruling Branzburg v. Hayes, which found that no one could refuse to testify before federal grand jury. 08.16.06

Journalists need a get-out-of-jail-free card
By Paul K. McMasters Law enforcement wants journalists to help do its investigating — and is filing charges against them if they refuse. 11.28.04

Jailed & subpoenaed journalists — a historical timeline

Shield laws


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 | 22:59:10
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links