First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Utah high court drafts journalist shield law

By The Associated Press

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah’s highest court has published a draft rule that would make it difficult for lawyers and judges to demand that news reporters reveal confidential sources for a story.

The state Supreme Court is taking public comments on the rule until Jan. 22.

“It creates a near absolute privilege for reporters and their confidential sources, meaning that if a journalist was called to testify in a court hearing or an administrative hearing, they could use this shield to protect their sources,” said Joel Campbell, a former journalist who teaches at Brigham Young University.

The four-page rule must be approved by a majority of the court’s five justices to take effect. State legislators have promised not to intervene.

Some prosecutors complain the privilege could keep guilty people from the reach of the law.

“Let’s assume there is a murder trial in process and during the trial one of the defendant’s fellow gang members goes to a reporter and says he committed the crime instead of the defendant,” said Paul Boyden, executive director of the Statewide Association of Prosecutors.

Under the rule, “we cannot go to the reporter and find out who it was who said that so we can make sure we are prosecuting the right person,” Boyden said.

Judges would make the call, after balancing the interests of justice against the free flow of information. Reporters would not have to reveal sources if the information sought by prosecutors or defense lawyers could be obtained some other way.

“I did a lot of research into the issue and realized that it really is necessary to have a reporter privilege,” Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said.

“Some of the most serious cases, particularly in regard to government secrecy, only came to light because someone came to a reporter in confidence,” he said.

Salt Lake Tribune Editor Nancy Conway said reporters still could be compelled to reveal sources in life-threatening situations.

Utah is one of three states that doesn’t offer reporters some protection from authorities.

The rule does not mention Internet bloggers, but an advisory committee to the Utah Supreme Court recognized the need to accommodate new electronic forms of expression.

“While there are not many ‘lone pamphleteers’ still functioning, they may have modern-day counterparts on the Internet,” the committee wrote.

Utah high court adopts broad privilege for reporters
New rule 'provides near-absolute protection for confidential sources,' says attorney for state media coalition. 01.25.08


Wash. state enacts sunshine, reporter shield laws

One measure mandates study of 300-plus exemptions to public-records law; other protects journalists from being jailed for refusing to reveal confidential sources. 04.30.07

House votes to give journalists shield for confidential sources
Co-sponsor Mike Pence, R-Ind., says measure 'is not about protecting reporters, it's about protecting the public's right to know.' 10.17.07

State shield statutes & leading cases
By Bill Kenworthy State-by-state compilation of journalist-shield statutes, cases. 10.17.05

Journalist ‘shield’ – balancing openness, security
By Gene Policinski Under a Senate bill, journalists would be protected from having to reveal confidential sources — but not if they witnessed a crime or if there were an imminent threat to life or national security. 10.07.07

Shield laws

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 | 22:59:16
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links