First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Journalist shield bill heads for hearings; support grows

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Federal judges would be prohibited from forcing journalists to reveal their confidential sources under legislation headed for a congressional hearing next month. But even as support for the bill grows, lawmakers acknowledged yesterday any such “shield law” probably wouldn't help two reporters now facing jail time for protecting their informants.

A House Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing on the bill May 12, and senators say they are optimistic a Senate Judiciary subcommittee will follow suit.

But Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., said that even if the bill passed quickly, which is unlikely, "the chances are it won't be in time" to keep reporters for Time magazine and The New York Times out of jail.

"Their crime was doing their jobs," said Dodd, adding that, "This is not about conferring special rights and privileges to the media. This is less about protecting journalists than it is about protecting ourselves."

A bipartisan group of House and Senate members said there was growing support for the bill, which would prohibit federal courts from forcing reporters to reveal their confidential sources. The measure would allow federal judges to seek information from reporters as a last resort in extreme situations, but never the name of the source.

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., said the bill "strikes a balance between the public's right to know and the fair administration of justice." A member of the judiciary panel, Pence said lawmakers also had had "very constructive conversations" about the bill with the White House.

First introduced by Dodd, the bill mirrors shield laws in 31 states, and is similar to existing Department of Justice guidelines. The key difference, said Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., is that the bill goes a step further than the Justice rules by offering no exceptions to the source protection.

"That may be the most controversial part," said Lugar, adding that he expected strong opposition to the bill.

The lawmakers said the only way whistleblowers will come forward and reveal government wrongdoing is if they have absolute assurance their identities will be protected.

Journalists have come under increasing pressure from courts to reveal their sources' identities.

Just last week a federal appeals court in Washington refused to reconsider a three-judge panel's ruling compelling Matthew Cooper of Time magazine and Judith Miller of The New York Times to testify before a federal grand jury about their sources or go to jail for up to 18 months.

The two reporters have been called to testify about the leak of an undercover CIA officer's name.

In a separate case, the Associated Press and other news organizations are appealing a federal judge's decision finding five reporters in contempt for refusing to identify their sources for stories about nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee. Appeals court arguments are set for May 9.

The judge says the information from the reporters is needed so that Lee, who was wrongly suspected of spying, can pursue his privacy lawsuit against government officials.

Last year, TV reporter Jim Taricani of Providence, R.I., was sentenced to home confinement after he refused a court order to reveal the confidential source of an undercover FBI videotape of an alleged bribe. He was released about three weeks ago after serving four months.

Bush administration opposes shield law
Senate Judiciary Committee hears testimony on legislation to protect reporters from jail when they refuse to reveal confidential sources. 07.20.05

Support builds for federal shield law, but vote unlikely this year
'This is a kind of issue that will take a great deal more public attention before it reaches critical mass,' says bill's chief Republican sponsor in House. 03.15.05


New York Times reporters refuse to reveal Wen Ho Lee sources

Two risk jail time for not disclosing who provided information about scientist when he was suspected of spying. 12.24.03

R.I. reporter convicted of criminal contempt
Jim Taricani, who faces up to six months in prison for refusing to identify source, calls ruling 'assault on journalistic freedom.' 11.18.04

Reporters, judges' relationship shifts, suggesting trouble for press
Small but growing number of journalists, news organizations are ensnared in legal system for defying judicial demands to disclose where they got their information. 03.11.05

Survey suggests journalists use confidential sources sparingly
Majority of 711 journalists responding to online questionnaire say they need unnamed sources, but use them in less than 10% of their news reports. 03.17.05

Full D.C. Circuit refuses reporters' appeal in CIA leak case
Publications will ask appeals court to put off any sanctions against journalists while they pursue Supreme Court review. 04.20.05

D.C. Circuit weighs reporter-contempt ruling in Wen Ho Lee case
As part of lawsuit against federal government, nuclear scientist's attorney asks judges to force journalists to identify sources of leaks. 05.11.05

Shield laws

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 | 22:59:09
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links