First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
2 justices say high court no place for TV cameras

By The Associated Press
04.06.06

WASHINGTON — Two Supreme Court justices said this week that cameras are fine in the House and Senate — but not at the high court. Lawmakers are considering proposals intended to put justices' sessions on television for the first time.

Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas provided the first reaction since the Senate Judiciary Committee passed a plan last week. A House bill is pending.

"It runs the risk of undermining the manner in which we consider the cases," Thomas told a House Appropriations panel that was meeting to consider the Supreme Court's budget request. "Certainly it will change our proceedings. And I don't think for the better."

The April 4 meeting was being aired live on C-SPAN, and the room was packed with television cameras and still photographers — as well as reporters using tape recorders and laptop computers, something also banned in the high court.

Rep. John Olver, D-Mass., said he did not think Congress should mandate cameras in the Court, but he told the justices, "You might get called to be a little bit tone deaf on the question if you don't move somewhere toward some openness and transparency."

Kennedy made clear that he thought the camera decision was the Court's business — not that of Congress.

"We've always taken the position and decided cases that it's not for the Court to tell the Congress how to conduct its proceedings," Kennedy said. "We feel very strongly that this matter should be left to the courts."

Kennedy added, "We have a dynamic that's different than yours: not better, not worse, but different."

Under the Senate plan, television coverage would be allowed of sessions unless a majority of the justices decide that coverage in a case would violate the due-process rights of the litigants.

Thomas said there was a potential conflict if the legislative branch tried to impose its rules on the judicial branch.

On other issues:

  • The justices presented a request for about $63 million for the next fiscal year, with more money for salaries, library books and five new positions. They also sought an extra $13 million for the Court's building.
  • Kennedy said he did not believe justices were compromising their impartiality by taking free trips, mainly to speak at law schools and to legal groups. He said justices do not talk about pending cases. They file details of travel on their yearly financial statements, he said.
  • Thomas said justices often deal with threats, in response to a question about an Internet death threat recently revealed by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. "It goes with the turf," Thomas said.
  • Kennedy said retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor had received permission from the chief justice to keep an office in the Supreme Court, although a nearby federal building was designed to house offices of up to three retired justices.
  • Kennedy said low judge pay "threatens the quality of our judiciary" and has demoralized federal judges.


Update
Chief justice says Court not interested in allowing cameras
During speech to 9th Circuit conference, John Roberts also pressed for increase in judicial pay. 07.16.06

Previous
Senate committee OKs TV in Supreme Court
Hearings could be televised under bill approved in Judiciary Committee; second bill would allow cameras in federal courts. 03.31.06

Related

Ind. to test cameras, audio in courtrooms

Pilot program will allow video, still photography, audio, Webcasts in some courts in response to news media requests. 05.10.06

Senator renews effort to televise high court proceedings
By Melanie Bengtson Arlen Specter re-introduces bill that would allow TV cameras in all open sessions unless majority of justices object. 02.09.07

Justice Kennedy to Congress: Don't allow cameras in high court
Meanwhile, several federal judges tell American Bar Association meeting that televising controversial trials would have benefited public. 02.15.07

Congress moves closer to allowing cameras in federal courts
By Tony Mauro Despite Supreme Court justices' long-standing unease over cameras, lawmakers think time may be right. 11.11.05

Cameras in the courtroom


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 17:36:03
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links