First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Senate panel OKs flag-burning amendment

By The Associated Press
07.20.04

WASHINGTON — A Senate panel approved a constitutional amendment today that would ban the burning of the American flag, but opponents of the measure say there's not enough support in the full, GOP-controlled Senate to push through a change to the Constitution.

The Senate Judiciary Committee approved a one-line change to the Constitution — "The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States" — on an 11-7 vote, which pushes the issue to the full Senate.

"The flag deserves constitutional protection, and legal scholars agree that this amendment is the only way to restore the law as it existed for most of our nation's history," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

Even though some Democrats are joining with the majority Republicans to support the change in the closely divided Senate, there won't be enough support to get the required 67 votes needed to approve a constitutional amendment, said Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., who opposes the change.

Many opponents say such an amendment would limit free speech.

"Thankfully, they do not have the votes to pass it on the floor, so this becomes something of a political exercise in an election year," Feingold said.

A proposed constitutional amendment needs a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate and approval by three-fourths of state legislatures. The flag-burning amendment passed the House on a 300-125 vote in June 2003.

Lawmakers have debated the flag amendment almost annually since Texas v. Johnson, a 5-4 Supreme Court decision in 1989 saying flag-burning was a protected free-speech right. That ruling overturned a 1968 federal statute and flag-protection laws in 48 states.

In 1990, Congress passed another law protecting the flag, but the Supreme Court that year, in another 5-4 ruling in United States v. Eichman, struck it down as unconstitutional.

"This amendment gives Congress the right to do what it was able to do back in 1989," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. "It offers a way to return the nation's flag to the protected status it deserves."

Since the Supreme Court ruling, the House has approved flag amendments in 1995, 1997, 1999 and 2001, all by more than 300 votes. The Senate, in votes in 1995 and 2000, came up with only 63 votes, four short of the two-thirds majority needed.

The Bush administration supports the flag-burning amendment, while Democratic presidential challenger John Kerry and his running mate John Edwards do not think the Constitution should be amended to add the ban.

The House bill is H.J. Res. 4 and the Senate bill is S.J. Res. 4.


Previous
Senate subcommittee approves flag amendment
Sen. Russell Feingold criticizes measure, saying it would 'permit the government to criminalize conduct that, however misguided and wrong, is clearly expressive.' 06.03.04

Related

House again OKs changing Constitution to ban flag-burning

Anti-desecration amendment, critics charge, would criminalize a powerful form of political protest. 06.04.03

GOP pushing for flag, 'under God' votes
House expected to vote next week on bill mandating that only state courts can hear cases involving the Pledge of Allegiance. 09.17.04

A brave lesson plan on the First Amendment
By Nat Hentoff Brooklyn high school valedictorian Tiffany Schley proves a class act even as officials censor her speech. 07.23.04

Burning the Bill of Rights to save the flag
By Paul K. McMasters It's a uniquely American right to speak through our flag, and uniquely un-American to try to ban or punish symbolic political speech — as the Senate looks poised to do. 09.10.04

Flag-burning overview


Recent flag legislative action

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 18:04:41
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links