First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Supreme Court told Wen Ho Lee case close to being settled

By The Associated Press
05.23.06

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday delayed a decision on whether to take up a fight over reporters' confidential sources, apparently because a former Los Alamos National Laboratory scientist's lawsuit that prompted journalist subpoenas may be settled.

A lawyer for former nuclear weapons scientist Wen Ho Lee told the Court in a letter last week "there have been recent settlement discussions with the government in the underlying case," in which Lee accused the government of violating his rights under the Privacy Act.

Appeals arising from that case are pending at the Supreme Court, brought by journalists who were found in civil contempt of court. The reporters have refused to disclose who leaked them information about an investigation of Lee.

Lee was never charged with espionage. He was arrested in December 1999 and charged with unlawfully copying material.

He spent 279 days in solitary confinement before pleading guilty in September 2000 to a single count of downloading data to computer tape. The government dropped 58 other counts and U.S. District Judge James Parker apologized to Lee, saying the government's handling of the case "embarrassed our entire nation and each of us who is a citizen of it."

Lee, who was fired from the northern New Mexico lab, has a filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages.

Brian A. Sun, one of Lee's attorneys, said "resolution of the entire case may be imminent." The letter was addressed to the Supreme Court's clerk.

Justices could have announced yesterday whether they would hear appeals from the reporters: H. Josef Hebert of the Associated Press, James Risen of The New York Times, Bob Drogin of the Los Angeles Times and Pierre Thomas, formerly of CNN and now working for ABC News.

The cases are Drogin v. Lee, 05-969, and Thomas v. Lee, 05-1114.


Update
5 news organizations to pay Wen Ho Lee
Settlement ends proceedings against reporters who were protecting confidential sources. 06.02.06

Previous
Reporters urge high court to consider confidential-sources case
'The issues presented here go to the heart of the press's function in a democracy,' states appeal by journalists ordered to reveal sources for stories about nuclear scientist. 02.01.06

Related

Full 4th Circuit: Scientist may pursue libel suit against N.Y. Times

Judges split 6-6 over whether to grant rehearing; dissenters say decision 'will restrict speech on a matter of vital public concern.' 10.19.05

Ongoing confidential-sources cases
By Bill Kenworthy Compilation tracking current cases involving efforts to force journalists to disclose confidential sources. 08.04.05

Jailed & subpoenaed journalists — a historical timeline

Reporter's Privilege/Shield Laws

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 18:14:59
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links