First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Federal judge finds Texas libel limits also apply to Web

By The Associated Press
10.19.06

DALLAS — A one-year statute of limitations for bringing libel lawsuits in Texas also applies to articles posted on the Internet, a federal judge has ruled.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge David Godbey is being hailed as an important decision that gives online media the same protections as traditional print and broadcast organizations.

Godbey ruled Oct. 16 in Nationwide Bi-Weekly Administration v. Belo Corp. that the one-year clock begins ticking when an article first appears on the Internet and ends a year later, even if the article in question remains accessible on the Internet.

It is the second time a federal judge recently determined that the Texas libel limits also apply to Internet-based media.

A lawyer for Belo Corp., a defendant in the case, praised the decision as a critical step for online media.

"The ruling is important because it allows Internet publishers — not limited to newspapers — to engage in the free exchange of ideas without being exposed to defamation claims based on articles viewable in the present but first posted to the Internet years earlier," said Russell Coleman, a Belo lawyer.

In dismissing the suit against The Dallas Morning News, personal finance columnist Scott Burns and parent company Belo, Godbey wrote that he "sees no rational reason for distinguishing between the Internet and other forms of traditional mass media."

The case against the newspaper began when Nationwide Bi-Weekly Administration Inc., an Ohio-based company specializing in mortgage-payment services, claimed that a column by Burns was inaccurate. Burns and the Morning News have repeatedly defended the column's accuracy.

Godbey's ruling did not address the column, but focused on the one-year statute. The company filed its suit within the proper period but failed to properly notify the defendants in time, Godbey said.

Nationwide is considering an appeal. Its attorney said the one-year statue does not take into account how Internet search engines can make an article written several years ago easily available today.

"It's not sitting in a library — it's staying on the Internet," said Barbara Bison Jacobson, Nationwide's lawyer. "How do we as a society deal with that?"

Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks in Austin dismissed a libel suit by a man who claimed he was defamed by an online article posted three years ago.


Related

Internet case tests whether out-of-state newspapers can be sued for libel

Federal appeals panel hears arguments in Virginia prison warden's attempt to sue Connecticut papers over online articles. 06.04.02

Calif. high court leans toward tossing Net libel lawsuit
Congress, other courts have already spoken on issue, justices say during hearing in case of woman who posted allegedly libelous e-mail on her Web site's message board. 09.06.06

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 22:04:13
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links