First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Press's Wen Ho Lee appeals denied review

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from news organizations fighting to protect confidential sources, declining to consider the case of four reporters in legal trouble over their stories about former nuclear weapons scientist Wen Ho Lee.

The Court's action, released today, was made without comment. Late last week, Lee, a Taiwanese-American, settled his privacy lawsuit, and will receive $1.6 million from the government and five news organizations.

Journalists had been in civil contempt of court for refusing to disclose who leaked them information about an espionage investigation of Lee, a nuclear weapons scientist fired from his job at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

Lee sued the government for violating his rights under the Privacy Act.

The prospect of Supreme Court inaction factored into the agreement by five news organizations, including the Associated Press, to make the payment to Lee.

"They played out the legal possibilities and they looked pretty bleak. Maybe discretion was the better part of valor," said University of Richmond law professor Carl Tobias.

Jane Kirtley, professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota, said she disagreed with the news companies' decision to pay Lee, particularly when the government is pressing reporters to reveal sources in several cases involving disclosure of classified information.

"It does not seem to me this is a really good time for news organizations to be suggesting that they are tacitly at fault when they receive leaked classified information, and the settlement certainly conveys that message," Kirtley said.

Like other press advocates, Kirtley said the best way to protect journalists would be the passage of a federal journalist shield law. Legislation has been introduced in the House and Senate, but prospects for passage are uncertain.

The four reporters are H. Josef Hebert of the Associated Press, James Risen of The New York Times, Bob Drogin of the Los Angeles Times and Pierre Thomas, formerly of CNN and now working for ABC News.

Justices could have dismissed the appeals on the basis of the out-of-court settlement. Instead, they denied review of the appeals, which had been filed on behalf of the reporters during the legal wrangling with Lee.

Betsy Miller, one of Lee's lawyers, called the court decision a surprise that "is an important, final vindication for Dr. Lee, as it resolves without any doubt that the court did not feel the reporters' appeals merited further review."

The cases are Drogin v. Lee, 05-969, and Thomas v. Lee, 05-1114.

Justice Stephen Breyer did not participate.

5 news organizations to pay Wen Ho Lee
Settlement ends proceedings against reporters who were protecting confidential sources. 06.02.06


N.Y. Times reporter subpoenaed over sources for book

James Risen's attorney says grand jury is seeking source of information for chapter in State of War regarding CIA effort to sabotage Iranian nuclear program. 02.04.08

Former USA Today reporter faces contempt in anthrax case
Federal judge says Toni Locy must identify sources for stories about ex-Army scientist Steven J. Hatfill or pay steep fines. 02.19.08

Press advocates decry steep fines for anthrax reporter
Federal judge denies Toni Locy's request to stay payment for contempt, rules ex-USA Today writer must 'personally bear the responsibility of paying the fine.' 03.10.08

Does it matter that the press is under siege?
By Paul K. McMasters Wen Ho Lee settlement marks another loss of ground in journalists’ efforts to report thoroughly, fairly on an increasingly secretive federal government. 06.18.06

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Thursday, August 21, 2008 | 22:37:09
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links