First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
College causes stir by knocking music-swappers offline

By The Associated Press

GAINESVILLE, Fla. — University of Florida officials say they’re simply enforcing the law. But civil libertarians say the school has itself become an enforcer for the recording industry.

In the annals of the online music wars, the university may well go down as one of the Recording Industry Association of America’s most loyal allies.

Chris Russell, an 18-year-old freshman, and some of his dorm buddies got their lesson this fall. As he was downloading Metallica tunes in his room, Russell suddenly lost his Internet connection.

Logging onto a university site, he was informed by a pop-up message that he’d violated the school’s downloading policy and his Internet service would be suspended for 30 minutes.

Russell was collared by new university software called ICARUS, or Integrated Control Application for Restricting User Services.

“It’s a pain in the neck,” Russell said of the program. “If I hear a song on the radio I like, I try to download it.”

It’s precisely such behavior that riles the music industry, which claims online song-swapping is largely responsible for a 31% drop in CD sales over the past three years.

The industry has used lawsuits and warning letters to try to thwart the practice at colleges and universities. It has also promoted commercial downloading services, including a recent deal with Penn State to offer the new Napster to students.

University of Florida officials say they’re open to a deal with a commercial service like Napster but say their students wouldn’t pay more than 50 cents a song — the Penn State deal will cost students there a buck for every track they want to keep.

Last spring, the pressure from record companies hit critical mass at UF. The school was getting about 40 notices a month asking it to disconnect students for illegal downloading. About 1,000 cases involving violations of copyright rules were clogging the school’s judicial system. An estimated 40% of dorm residents were downloading illegally.

So network administrators went to work on ICARUS, which debuted over the summer and affects the 7,500 of Florida’s 48,500 students who live on campus — and are thus on its high-speed network.

ICARUS scans the network to ensure students are not pulling down music or video using peer-to-peer software. For a first violation, transgressors lose Internet access for 30 minutes and must watch a 10-minute interactive Web program on copyright law. A second violation bars students from the Internet for five days, while a third can result in a lengthy ban and could lead to a written reprimand.

More than 100 students have been caught downloading twice, the school says, and so far there are no three-time violators.

Paul David Einslen, president of a dormitory at UF, said most students were initially upset but now accept that they can’t use the university system to download movies, music and software.

Many students are nevertheless concerned, he said, “about the whole scanning of their computer with Big Brother monitoring and watching everything.”

That doesn’t necessarily mean students are buying more compact discs, though.

“Students are pretty smart. They’ll come up with some way to circumvent it. They’ll just go off campus and do it,” said Charles Scales, owner of Hyde & Zeke, a music store near campus. Scales said he hasn’t seen sales rise post-ICARUS.

Rob Bird, UF’s coordinator of network services who co-developed the program, says he’s received inquiries about it from more than 110 universities, eight Internet service providers and 23 private companies.

Bird declined to name any of them, and said the school will not release the program until the spring. “We are finalizing some technical developments,” he said. “There are a lot of licensing issues to resolve.”

Cary Sherman, president of the RIAA, praised ICARUS as an “impressive” home-grown solution.

But Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an online civil liberties group, said universities should realize their computer networks are to serve students and “not to be an enforcement arm of the recording industry.”

Many schools prefer a middle ground.

Oberlin College in Ohio, like scores of colleges and universities, uses network software that greatly reduces peer-to-peer traffic but doesn’t eliminate it.

“Thus, for now, we are sidestepping the censorship issue,” said John Bucher, the school’s information technology director.

Students at the University of California-Berkeley are allowed to download 5 gigabytes worth of data each week, said Brad Andrews, manager of residential computing for the 6,000 students living in campus housing.

“We don’t outlaw peer-to-peer sharing, we limit bandwidth. We don’t monitor content, we do care about your usage,” he said. However, if the university receives a notice from the music industry that a student is sharing copyrighted material, students are asked to remove the material.

A survey by the Campus Computing Project shows that about 80% of public universities and 78% of private universities have campus codes of conduct that forbid downloading copyrighted material, said Kenneth Green, founder of the project.

While not condoning the downloading of music files by college students, Green said media industries “continue to focus on college students because they represent a large, easily identifiable and easily targeted population.”


Schools split on whether to block students' Napster access

To some colleges, universities, it's an information-freedom issue; to others, it's an ethical matter. 10.02.00

2nd appeals court tosses music-piracy subpoenas
Recording industry can't force Internet providers to identify music downloaders under copyright law. 01.05.05

RIAA targets college students in music-piracy crackdown
'Obviously I knew it was illegal, but no one got in trouble for it,' says University of Nebraska sophomore who settled her case for $3,000. 05.16.07

Copyright, P2P & Google

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Friday, August 22, 2008 | 00:31:07
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links