frequently asked questionscases & resources  
Cases & resources

Attorney ads

Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc., 515 U.S. 618 (1995)
Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Committee of Illinois, 496 U.S. 91 (1990)
Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Ass’n, 486 U.S. 466 (1988)
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626 (1985)
In re R.M.J., 455 U.S. 191 (1982)
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn., 436 U.S. 447 (1978)
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977)
Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 (1976)
Bigelow v.Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975)
Valentine v. Chrestensen, 316 U.S. 52 (1942)

Hudson, David L. Jr., “Solicitation Letters: Offensive or Informative?: Debate Pits Privacy and Reputational Concerns Against First Amendment Rights,” 27 Vanderbilt Lawyer No. 1 (1997), p. 23
Kennedy, Jack W. Jr., “The Widespread Embrace of the Waiting Period Upheld in Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc.: Toward a Nationwide Thirty-Day Wait for Justice, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 777 (2001)
Phillips, John, “Six Years after Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc.: The Continual Erosion of First Amendment Rights,” 14 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 197 (2000)
Smolla, Rodney, “The Puffery of Lawyers,” 36 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1, 10 (2002)




print this   Print
 SEARCH  MORE
advertising & First Amendment issues >
Tobacco ads
News racks
Gambling ads
Billboards
Compelled advertising
Attorney ads
FDA labeling
Telemarketing