overviewfrequently asked questionscases & resources
  FAQs >
 
Does using filters to block parts of the Internet violate the First Amendment?
 
Internet filters give librarians control in order to protect children from harmful material. What’s the objection?
 
Who is affected by the U.S. v. ALA ruling?
 
Can’t patrons ask librarians to override filters when mistakes are made?
 
After U.S. v. ALA, are there any other legal options?
 
How much influence do private companies have over access?
 
Did the Supreme Court decide that there can be no book censorship in public school libraries?
 
How does the Patriot Act involve the First Amendment?
 
 

Supporters of the USA Patriot Act contend that the law is a necessary response to the post-Sept. 11 world that contains very real threats of international and domestic terrorism. Detractors contend that at least some provisions of the Patriot Act infringe on constitutional rights. Though many provisions of the Patriot Act more directly affect Fourth Amendment freedoms (the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures), some provisions implicate the First Amendment.

For example, Section 215 of the Patriot Act gives the FBI broad powers to obtain records from libraries, bookstores, businesses and other entities. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, which is challenging this section in a federal court in Michigan, this provision directly affects political and religious expression. An Internet service provider might be asked to turn over records relating to individuals who engage in political speech highly critical of the government. A mosque might be forced to turn over records of members who are targeted by law enforcement. Another provision of the Patriot Act provides that it is illegal to provide “material support” for terrorist groups, but defines “material support” to include “expert assistance and advice.” This expert assistance might include advice about international law.

On March 9, 2006, President Bush signed the USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3199) and the USA Patriot Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (S. 2271). Several provisions of the act were reauthorized along with stronger requirements that the government must meet before it can access information. Nonetheless, the act still authorizes the government to obtain secret court orders to get library, medical and business records.

Under the reauthorization of Section 215, the FBI can obtain library records of anyone if the agency shows it has “reasonable grounds” to believe the records are “relevant” for an authorized investigation to “protect against international terrorism.” If a library merely provides Internet access, it cannot be asked to hand over information regarding a patron’s Internet use. However, if a library is an Internet service provider, the government can request such information. A person, such as a librarian, who receives a Section 215 order to disclose information, is limited to disclosing the receipt of the order to an attorney or to a “person to whom disclosure is necessary to comply with such order.” The reauthorization also allows those receiving a Section 215 order to challenge the “gag order” that accompanies all requests for information. However, those wanting to challenge the nondisclosure requirement of the order must wait a year to begin proceedings. A sunset provision for Section 215 sets it to expire Dec. 31, 2009.

At the signing of the act’s reauthorization, President Bush issued a signing statement saying that despite the law’s requirement for disclosure about government investigations, he would allow the executive branch to withhold information if he decided it would “impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative process of the executive, or the performance of the executive’s constitutional duties.” The Senate Judiciary Committee opened hearings in June 2006 regarding presidential signing statements.

 
 
Have there been measures in Congress that would limit the Patriot Act?
 
If a public library allows groups to meet in its building, must it allow groups like the Ku Klux Klan? Can it set guidelines?
 
  View All Answers    Clear All Answers
 
 
print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, August 22, 2008 | 08:13:32
 SEARCH  MORE
Libraries & First Amendment issues >
Banned books
Internet Filters & Public Libraries
Patriot Act