First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Calif. judge: City can't sue sponsor of pot-related initiative

By The Associated Press

SANTA BARBARA, Calif. — A judge yesterday threw out a lawsuit the City Council had filed against the sponsor of a citizen initiative that made busting adults for marijuana crimes the lowest priority for police.

Superior Court Judge Thomas Anderle dismissed the lawsuit against Heather Poet, who sponsored the initiative passed last November.

"It was terrifying to be sued by my own government, and for a fleeting moment it made me feel maybe I shouldn't have gotten involved in the democratic process," Poet said in a statement.

"But this decision proves we do have a voice and we should never be afraid to use it," she said.

Measure P said that investigating, citing, arresting and prosecuting people for adult marijuana offenses — except for using pot in public or while driving — was the "lowest law enforcement priority" in the city.

The city argued that the measure was invalid and would prohibit enforcement of state and federal drug laws.

The judge disagreed, calling Measure P "a proper legislative enactment."

"Police officers can still arrest those who violate drug possession laws in their presence. The voters have simply instructed them that they have higher priority work to do," the judge wrote in City of Santa Barbara v. Poet.

The court also struck down the city's lawsuit on grounds that Poet was being sued for exercising her constitutionally protected right of free speech as an initiative sponsor. The judge found that the city violated California's anti-SLAPP law, which bars "strategic lawsuits against public participation."

It is the "duty of courts to jealously guard the people's right of initiative and referendum," the ruling said, citing language from a 1984 California Supreme Court ruling, American Labor Federation v. Eu.

Anderle said there was nothing in the law prohibiting enforcement of state law and added that the city "is free to decline to enforce federal criminal statutes."

Adam Wolf, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union Drug Law Reform Project, which represented Poet, said the ruling was a major victory for the democratic process and a resounding affirmation of voters' rights to de-prioritize marijuana enforcement.

City Attorney Stephen Wiley said the city had instituted the measures contained in the ordinance and only sued to clarify its legality.

"We still think there's a chance this is pre-empted by state and federal law but ... the judge didn't see it that way," Wiley said.

The City Council will decide whether to appeal the decision, he said.

"It's not unusual for initiative measures, particularly local initiatives" to go to a court, Wiley added. "There's a lot of cases out there."


State judge throws out arts agency's suit against Cincinnati boycotters

Court upholds arguments by Coalition for a Just Cincinnati that the First Amendment allows members to contact artists, urge them not to perform in city. 08.27.02

S.C. town hauls petitioners into court
Residents who signed petition asking Blythewood's council to adopt new ordinances are summoned to court after council asks judge to decide whether proposals would be legal. 10.20.03

Vitamin maker who SLAPPed critic must pay
Federal magistrate's order follows March ruling that found company violated California law when it sued Barry Minkow for fair criticism. 05.09.08

SLAPP suits

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Monday, September 22, 2008 | 18:29:25
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links