First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Internet libel case with global implications ends in settlement

By The Associated Press

MELBOURNE, Australia — In a low-key end to a groundbreaking case that extended the reach of Australia's libel laws to the world, Dow Jones & Co. has settled a defamation lawsuit launched against it by an Australian mining magnate.

The case started after mining boss Joe Gutnick claimed that an October 2000 Barron's magazine article had portrayed him as a schemer given to stock scams, money laundering and fraud. The article was also published online.

Dow Jones, which publishes The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Dow Jones Newswires and several stock market indicators, argued that the case should have been heard in the United States, where libel rulings are regarded as more favorable to publishers, because the article originally was published there.

But in a landmark ruling in December 2002, the High Court of Australia unanimously ruled that the case could be heard in Gutnick's home state of Victoria because people there could have read the article online.

Scholars said the decision — the first by a nation's top court to deal with alleged cross-border Internet defamation — created a global precedent that could subject Internet publishers to lawsuits regardless of their geographical location.

A settlement in the case emerged Nov. 12 following out-of-court mediation.

Lawyers for Dow Jones issued a statement in Victoria Supreme Court saying Barron's never intended to suggest that Gutnick was a customer of Melbourne man Nachum Goldberg, who was jailed for tax evasion and money laundering.

"I was delighted to hear the statement being read out in court — it was an outrageous allegation," Gutnick said.

Dow Jones also agreed to pay Gutnick $137,500 in addition to $306,000 in legal fees.

The settlement is not likely to affect the precedent already set, said University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist, who noted courts in the United Kingdom and Canada have already cited the Australian decision in asserting jurisdiction over other Internet defamation cases.

"The actual Gutnick dispute may be over, but its legacy will likely live on in the world of Internet law for many years to come," Geist said.

Australia's high court gives man go-ahead to sue U.S. publication for libel
Analysts believe ruling against Dow Jones & Co. in Internet defamation case could set precedent for courts, affect publishers and Web sites around the world. 12.11.02


High court turns away fight over Net jurisdiction

Justices haven't been willing to consider cyberspace legal boundary issue: Where can lawsuits involving the Web be filed? 04.28.03

Time to fight defamation ruling by Indonesian court
Judges ordered magazine to pay $106 million for alleging family of former dictator Suharto amassed billions of dollars during his 32-year rule. 09.11.07

N.Y. high court takes up case of Saudi billionaire vs. U.S. author
Judges to decide if 'long-arm' law provides the state jurisdiction over someone in another country who sues New Yorker; after ruling, case to return to 2nd Circuit. 11.16.07

2 international libel cases could benefit U.S. publishers
By Douglas Lee In one case, Canadian court tosses suit against Washington Post; in other, author asks U.S. court to declare British libel judgment unenforceable in states. 10.18.05

Online libel

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Monday, September 22, 2008 | 21:32:49
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links