First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Calif. high court leans toward tossing Net libel lawsuit

By The Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court is taking a dim view of libel lawsuits against Web site operators who post inflammatory information from other sources.

The justices said during a 60-minute court hearing yesterday testing the 1996 Communications Decency Act that Congress and other courts have already spoken on the issue. The justices were leaning toward tossing out a lawsuit against a San Diego woman who posted an allegedly libelous e-mail she received on her site’s message board.

The widely watched case, Barrett v. Rosenthal, S122953, included briefs from some of the Internet’s biggest names, including, America Online Inc., eBay Inc., Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc., all of which took the defendant’s side for fear that a ruling against her could also open them up to the same type of liability.

Justice Ming Chin wondered aloud yesterday whether there was “any contrary legal authority” to support a damages claim against Ilena Rosenthal, a woman’s health advocate who runs various message boards and promotes alternative medicine.

The seven justices debated congressional legislation and court decisions that granted Internet service providers and people like Rosenthal immunity from being sued for the content of others’ speech.

Unlike newspapers, which are liable for what it prints, Congress treated the Internet much differently, in large part to not hinder the free flow of massive amounts of information available to anyone with Internet access.

“Why shouldn’t we leave it for Congress?” Chief Justice Ronald George said.

The court will rule within 90 days.

The case concerns a 2004 California lower court decision allowing the case brought by Terry Polevoy, a Canadian doctor, and Stephen Barrett, a Pennsylvania doctor. In 2000, Rosenthal posted an opinion piece from a man whom the doctors also are suing for libel.

The posting contained an account of Polevoy’s alleged attempts to cancel an alternative medicine radio show in Canada by using what was described as “scare tactics, stalking and intimidation techniques” against the show’s host.

The doctors’ attorney, Christopher Grell, said allowing people to post libelous information is absurd. He said the issue intersected free speech and “the right to seek redress from the court.” He said letting Rosenthal off the hook would equal “the total sacrifice of a person’s good reputation.”

Justice Carol Corrigan wasn’t moved.

“Isn’t the whole point here that the Internet is just different?” she said.

Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar suggested the court’s hands were tied by precedent. She said Grell was making “policy arguments” for “Congress to weigh.”

Justice Joyce Kennard noted that lower court’s decision was contrary to precedent and law and “would encourage excessive censorship.” Still, she added, that “doesn’t mean this court should be like a sheep and follow the other courts.”

Calif. high court: Web sites not liable for third-party postings
Unless Congress revises existing law, people who claim they were defamed online can only seek damages from original source, majority finds. 11.21.06


N.J. court: Web site publisher not liable for e-messages

Local officials had sued Stephen Moldow for third-party comments posted on 'Eye on Emerson' discussion forum. 02.02.05

Fla. jury awards $11.3 million in Net-defamation case
Children's services referral provider sued after a mother posted messages calling her a 'con artist,' 'crook,' and 'fraud'; legal analysts say award is among largest for online-libel cases. 10.12.06

Federal judge finds Texas libel limits also apply to Web
Ruling that upholds 1-year statute of limitations hailed as important decision that gives online media same protections as traditional print, broadcast organizations. 10.19.06

Obscure Internet libel provision hits the big time
By Douglas Lee 9th Circuit finds protections afforded Internet speech by CDA's Section 230(c) exceed those offered by First Amendment. 07.10.03

Online libel

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Thursday, November 13, 2008 | 21:06:29
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links