First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Falwell urges followers to defend Christmas from 'grinches'

By The Associated Press
12.01.05

ROANOKE, Va. — The Rev. Jerry Falwell has marshaled his forces to keep "Merry Christmas" in the vernacular and "Silent Night" on the school playlist.

Falwell, founder of Liberty University in Lynchburg and the defunct Moral Majority, has e-mailed 500,000 followers to urge them to support the "Friend or Foe Christmas Campaign" conducted by a conservative legal organization affiliated with his ministry.

"I asked about 100,000 pastors nationwide to join me in dealing with the 'grinches' who are trying to steal Christmas," Falwell said in a Nov. 28 telephone interview with the Associated Press.

Falwell contends the grinches are organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, groups he says are spreading misinformation.

The "Friend or Foe" campaign by the Liberty Counsel is intended to let public officials know that Christmas is legal. The organization is backing that up with the free services of 700 lawyers ready to file suit to protect the holiday's celebration.

"Many officials erroneously believe it's unconstitutional to celebrate Christmas," said Mathew Staver, president and general counsel of the Orlando, Fla.-based Liberty Counsel.

The biggest skirmish so far this year has come in Boston, where a reference to the "holiday" tree on a city Web site drew fire from Christian groups. Officials removed the reference and Mayor Thomas Menino later said the tree on Boston Common was never intended to be anything other than a Christmas tree.

"The Boston Christmas tree issue was a minor thing, but had it been allowed to stand, it would have sent a signal across the nation that people of faith should not be allowed public expression," Falwell said.

Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, sees the issue differently. It's perfectly legal for a community to have a holiday tree, he said, adding that Falwell was trying to "force people to do things his way."

Lynn admits that bureaucrats occasionally have crossed the line in restricting religious expressions of Christmas, but says there really is no "foe" in this campaign.

"There hasn't been any war against Christmas — ever," he said.

Falwell said a memo explaining what the law allows was sent to several thousand school districts across the country and to retailers.

The Alliance Defense Fund, based in Scottsdale, Ariz., is conducting a similar effort and has enlisted the services of 800 lawyers.

This is the third year of Liberty Counsel's campaign, but the first time Falwell has been involved.

"We were beginning to hear from constituents across the country that their children were being advised there would be no Christmas programs this year," Falwell said. "We decided to put a stop to that."


Related

December dilemma: What should schools do about Christmas?

By Charles C. Haynes Celebrating Christmas as a nonreligious pop-culture extravaganza is a doomed strategy. 11.16.03

Merry fill-in-the-blank: fighting over the December dilemma
By Charles C. Haynes From Maine to California, Americans are arguing more than ever about how to celebrate the season of 'peace on earth, goodwill toward men.' 12.19.04

Merry generic holidays?


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, November 14, 2008 | 02:45:30
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links