First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Study finds news media sued less but shell out more in damages

By The Associated Press

NEW YORK — News-media organizations were sued less often and won more lawsuits in the past five years than they did in previous decades, but they paid more on average in damages when they lost, according to a media-monitoring organization.

In a study that has been ongoing since 1980, the Media Law Resource Center found that news-media organizations have successfully defended themselves in 53.8% of the lawsuits filed against them so far this decade.

They won 36.3% of the lawsuits filed against them in the 1980s and 40.2% of the lawsuits filed against them in the 1990s, according to the MLRC.

Media organizations were sued about half as many times between 2000 and 2005 as they were in the '80s, the MLRC study found. Fourteen suits were brought in 2005, just above the average of 13.8 so far this decade, which reflects a downward trend from an average of 27 in the '80s and 18.8 in the '90s.

"This is good news for those who understand the threat posed to free speech and press from the enormous time and expense of these kinds of lawsuits," MLRC Executive Director Sandra Baron said in a statement.

Of the 14 suits brought in 2005, media organizations won half of them. In the seven cases they lost, they paid an average of $369,000 in damages.

2005 marks an unusually forgiving year in terms of damages, which have moved upward from an average of more than $1.5 million in the '80s to an average of $2.8 million so far this decade.

The survey reflects a total of 531 trial lawsuits since 1980. The MLRC said 87.6% of the lawsuits accused defendants of defamation.

The New York-based MLRC is a nonprofit organization established by media groups to monitor trends and promote First Amendment rights.


Full 4th Circuit: Scientist may pursue libel suit against N.Y. Times

Judges split 6-6 over whether to grant rehearing; dissenters say decision 'will restrict speech on a matter of vital public concern.' 10.19.05

Judge dismisses lawsuit stemming from criminal-libel charge
Newspaper columnist, city councilman had accused Baxter Springs, Kan., officials of violating their civil rights by pursuing defamation charges. 12.29.05

Judge won't vacate libel judgment against Boston Herald
Municipal Court finds alleged misconduct by Superior Court judge who won $2.1 million verdict had no bearing on the evidence. 01.20.06

Mass. high court upholds libel judgment against Boston Herald
Jury had sided with Judge Ernest Murphy, who said newspaper depicted him as soft on crime, insensitive to suffering of 14-year-old rape victim. 05.08.07

Libel & defamation

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Saturday, January 24, 2009 | 19:16:25
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links