First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
FCC chairman calls for bigger fines for broadcast indecency

By The Associated Press
01.15.04

WASHINGTON — The head of the Federal Communications Commission, upset over the growing use of profanity on television and radio, wants to sharply increase the penalties for broadcasters airing indecent programs.

FCC Chairman Michael Powell said at a National Press Club luncheon yesterday that the current maximum penalty, $27,500 for each incident, should be 10 times higher.

"Some of these fines are peanuts — they are peanuts because they haven't been touched in decades," Powell said. "They're just the cost of doing business to a lot of producers, and that has to change."

Powell's proposal, which needs congressional approval, comes amid continued criticism of the FCC for a ruling in October that an expletive uttered by the musician Bono on a network TV program was not indecent because it was used as an adjective rather than to describe a sex act. And it follows a report in September by a conservative advocacy group, the Parents Television Council, which found much more foul language on network TV.

Powell, who has asked his four fellow commissioners to overturn the ruling on Bono, said it was irresponsible for broadcasters to air profanity during hours when children may be watching.

Federal law and FCC rules ban radio stations and broadcast television channels from airing obscene material at any time, and from airing indecent material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. The FCC defines obscene material as describing sexual conduct "in a patently offensive way" and lacking "serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value." Indecent material is not as offensive but still contains references to sex or excretions.

"It's irresponsible of our programmers to continue to try to push the envelope of a reasonable set of policies that tries to legitimately balance the interests of the First Amendment with the need to protect our kids," Powell said. "I think that line is beginning to be crossed."

One of the two Democratic commissioners, Jonathan Adelstein, backed Powell's call for higher fines.

"We get a lot of complaints," Adelstein said. "We're getting serious about it now. Hopefully, we'll see less people crossing the line on this. We want to give them incentives to do that."

The National Association of Broadcasters declined to comment. So did NBC, which aired the Golden Globe Awards show last year where Bono, lead singer of the Irish rock group U2, said "this is really, really f------ brilliant."

The FCC's enforcement bureau said Bono's comments were not indecent or obscene because the F-word was used as an adjective.

But lawmakers have been quick to react.

Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on telecommunications and the Internet, said he would introduce legislation to increase the maximum fines for indecency. His subcommittee plans a hearing on the issue Jan. 28.

"Clearly, we're beyond the 'Ozzie and Harriet,' days but we still don't need some of this language that's out there," Upton said. "It's on the air because they can get away with it."

Watchdog groups say broadcasters are trying to compete with racier cable television channels, which are not covered by the same FCC rules, and trying to attract the young males coveted by advertisers.

"This is a game where you're competing for audiences," said Celia Wexler, research director for Common Cause. "They're not thinking about what the soccer mom and their kids might enjoy; they're thinking about what that 18- to 24-year-old male might enjoy."

The commission's two largest penalties for indecency were $1.7 million against Infinity Broadcasting in 1995 to settle several cases against radio disc jockey Howard Stern and $357,000 in October against Infinity for a segment on the "Opie and Anthony" radio show in which a couple was said to be having sex in New York's St. Patrick's Cathedral.


Related

FCC proposes fines for shock jocks' sex segments

Four commissioners vote for monetary penalties in separate incidents in New York, Washington; fifth says agency should have gone after stations' licenses. 10.03.03

Congressman proposes banning 8 crude words from airwaves
Doug Ose says he was amazed when the FCC refused to sanction TV stations that showed Bono using expletive at last January's Golden Globe Awards. 12.16.03

House panel blasts FCC over indecency standards
Republicans, Democrats take turns criticizing federal regulators, who they say haven't done enough to shield public from offensive programming on radio, TV. 01.29.04

FCC launches probe into Super Bowl halftime show
Chief regulator calls performance in which Janet Jackson's breast was exposed 'a classless, crass and deplorable stunt,' says investigation will be 'thorough and swift.' 02.02.04

Grammar lesson: how the FCC embraced the F-word
By Ken Paulson Government agency looked at its profanity regulations and found they covered only certain parts of speech; now a congressman wants to rediagram the restrictions. 01.25.04

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Saturday, January 24, 2009 | 17:58:43
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links