First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
TV networks, stations challenge FCC indecency ruling

By The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — Objecting to what they called increasing government control of what people watch on television, four TV broadcast networks and their affiliates filed court challenges to a Federal Communications Commission ruling that found several programs "indecent" because of language.

ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox, along with their network-affiliate associations and the Hearst-Argyle Television group of stations, filed notices of appeal in various federal courts, including in Washington, D.C., and New York. Some were filed late April 13 and the rest April 14.

Broadcasters have complained that federal enforcement of indecency rules is vague and inconsistent. Millions of dollars in fines have been levied under the rules.

The appeals challenge the FCC's March 15 finding that profane language was used on the CBS program "The Early Show" in 2004, incidents involving Cher and Nicole Richie on the "Billboard Music Awards" shows broadcast by Fox in 2002 and 2003 and various episodes of the ABC show "NYPD Blue" that aired in 2003.

The FCC did not issue fines in those cases because the incidents occurred before a 2004 ruling that virtually any use of certain expletives would be considered profane and indecent.

The networks and affiliate groups, representing more than 800 individual stations, issued a rare joint statement April 14 saying they objected to "growing government control over what viewers should and shouldn't see on television."

The group said parents already had the ability to block certain programs by using the V-chip and various other parental controls.

FCC spokeswoman Tamara Lipper said April 14 that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled more than 20 years ago that comedian George Carlin's monologue on the "seven dirty words you can't say on television and radio" was indecent.

"Today, Disney, Fox and CBS challenged that precedent and argued that they should be able to air two of those same words," Lipper said. "We are reviewing their filings."

The Walt Disney Co. owns ABC.

Though none of the cases involved NBC, the network filed a petition to intervene on behalf of the other networks and stations.

Separately, CBS asked the FCC to reconsider a proposed record fine of $3.6 million against dozens of CBS stations and affiliates for a 2004 episode of "Without a Trace" as well as a proposed $550,000 fine for the Janet Jackson "wardrobe malfunction" during the Super Bowl in 2004. April 14 was the deadline for the requests.

In three of the cases being appealed, the FCC found that violations occurred during live broadcasts. A contestant from the CBS show "Survivor: Vanuatu," for instance, used a variation of the S-word when referring to another contestant on "The Early Show" in December 2004.

The FCC found the use "indecent," but did not issue a fine because "our precedent at the time of the broadcast did not clearly indicate that the commission would take enforcement action against an isolated use of the 'S-word,'" the FCC wrote in its March 15 order.

In the case of "NYPD Blue," the FCC found that the show's use of a variation of the S-word was indecent because the episode aired at 9 p.m. in the Central and Mountain time zones. The use of the word after 10 p.m. in the Eastern and Pacific time zones was not objectionable, the FCC found.

FCC wants to reconsider indecency ruling
Attorney asks 2nd Circuit to delay hearing broadcasters' lawsuit so that agency can review its finding that 'NYPD Blue,' three other TV shows violated indecency rules. 08.30.06


FCC proposes $3.9 million in fines for indecent TV programming

Record fine would punish CBS for episode of 'Without a Trace' crime drama depicting teen orgy. 03.16.06

Senate approves 10-fold increase for TV, radio indecency fines
Broadcast networks would be subject to higher penalties; policy wouldn't apply to cable or satellite channels. 05.23.06

Congress votes to increase indecency fines 10-fold
Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act passes House, 379-35; president expected to sign it. 06.07.06

Bush signs broadcast-decency law
Large increase in fines will force broadcasters to 'take seriously their duty to keep the public airwaves free of obscene, profane and indecent material,' president says. 06.16.06

PBS chief calls indecency rules unclear, 'paralyzing'
Paula Kerger says FCC regulations, fines put public TV stations at risk, threaten to deprive viewers of important programs. 07.29.06

CBS asks 3rd Circuit to overturn Super Bowl fine
Network argues $550,000 penalty for Janet Jackson's 2004 breast-baring performance is 'unconstitutional, contrary to the Communications Act and FCC rules and generally arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law.' 07.31.06

FCC to TV viewers: Watch what we say
By Paul K. McMasters Pressure for more-aggressive regulation of broadcast indecency raises significant First Amendment concerns for viewers as well as creators of TV programming. 04.09.06


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Saturday, January 24, 2009 | 23:50:58
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links