First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Cheney claims power to decide on his records

By The Associated Press
12.19.08

WASHINGTON — Dick Cheney's lawyers are asserting that the vice president alone has the authority to determine which records, if any, from his tenure will be handed over to the National Archives when he leaves office in January.

That claim is in federal court documents asking that a lawsuit over the records be dismissed. Cheney leaves office Jan. 20, potentially taking with him millions of records that might otherwise become public record.

"The vice president alone may determine what constitutes vice presidential records or personal records, how his records will be created, maintained, managed and disposed, and are all actions that are committed to his discretion by law," according to a court filing by Cheney's office with the U.S. District Court on Dec. 8.

Cheney is being sued by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a government-watchdog group that is trying to ensure that no presidential records are destroyed or handled in a way that makes them unavailable to the public.

The 1978 Presidential Records Act requires all presidential and vice-presidential records to be transferred to the National Archives immediately upon the end of the president's last term of office. It gives the archivist responsibility to preserve and control access to the records. The law ended the tradition of private ownership of presidential papers, opening White House records to the public and historians.
But the law carves out exceptions for personal or purely partisan records.

National Archives officials have said records of Cheney's dealings with the Republican National Committee would not require preservation under the law. As of November, it had not made a final determination on the status of Cheney's records produced when he acts as president of the Senate. Cheney says those records are exempt.

But the law is unclear on how disagreements will be decided about the preservation of disputed records, said Steven Aftergood, a government-secrecy expert at the Federation of American Scientists.

"Decisions that are made in the next couple of weeks may prove irrevocable. If records are held from the archivist now they may never be recovered," Aftergood said.

A judge in September ordered Cheney to preserve all his records while the suit continued.


Update
Federal judge: Cheney has broad discretion over records
However, court rejects Bush administration's expansive view that vice president alone has right to decide what Presidential Records Act means for his office. 01.20.09

Previous
Cheney ordered to save vice-presidential records
Bush administration's legal position 'heightens the court's concern' that some documents may not be preserved, says federal judge. 09.22.08

Related

Federal judge sides with White House in e-mail controversy

In lawsuit brought by one citizens' group, court finds Office of Administration isn't subject to FOIA; another challenge over possibly missing messages is still active. 06.17.08

Group takes quest for White House e-mails to D.C. Circuit
Three-judge panel seems wary of watchdog's claim that Office of Administration should be forced to reveal records that might explain what happened to missing messages. 11.17.08

Congress to judge: Force Bush to leave records at White House
Justice Department lawyers argue that White House is required to give documents — which include material on firings of federal prosecutors — to National Archives. 01.09.09

Federal judge rules against White House on visitor logs
Court says likelihood of harm to president's ability to perform constitutional duties isn't great enough to justify curtailing public-disclosure goals of FOIA. 01.12.09

Bush should put his trust in US
By Douglas Lee In the meantime, courts are pushing back, ruling twice in recent weeks for the public's right to know. 09.30.08

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Sunday, January 25, 2009 | 01:14:39
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

First Reports
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links