First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
Beleaguered U. of Colo. professor vows to fight dismissal

By The Associated Press

Editor's note: Tenured professor Ward Churchill alleges in his lawsuit filed July 25 that after his Sept. 11 essay came to light, "the university vowed to examine every word ever written or spoken by Professor Churchill in an effort to find some excuse for terminating his employment." University spokesman Ken McConnellogue said the school stands behind the regents' vote to fire Churchill. "We believe this is a matter of academic integrity for the university, so we will not be settling the lawsuit," he said.

BOULDER, Colo. — A professor scorned for remarks about Sept. 11 victims vowed that his firing over allegations of plagiarism, falsification and other misconduct wouldn't end his 2 1/2-year dispute with the University of Colorado.

"New game, new game," said a defiant Ward Churchill, referring to his intent to sue the university after the state Board of Regents voted 8-1 yesterday to remove him as ethnic-studies chairman.

Three faculty committees had accused Churchill of plagiarism, falsification and other misconduct in portions of his research. The allegations were unrelated to an essay he wrote that likened some victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks to a Nazi leader.

David Lane, Churchill's attorney, said his client's dismissal simply marked a change in venue for the dispute.

"We're out of kangaroo court and going into real court," he said.

Lane plans to file a lawsuit in Denver today alleging Churchill's First Amendment rights were violated. He said Churchill was targeted because of his views.

University President Hank Brown said the school had little choice but to fire Churchill to protect the integrity of the university's research.

"I think from all the discussion I've heard, the focus on this question solely related to his research and the efforts to falsify research, and specifically, both the charges and the discussion did not relate to 9/11," Hank said.

Churchill had vowed to file a lawsuit if he was fired, a threat Brown said had no bearing on the decision.

The university's allegations against Churchill included misrepresenting the effects of federal laws on American Indians, fabricating evidence that the Army deliberately spread smallpox to Mandan Indians in 1837, and claiming the work of a Canadian environmental group as his own.

The essay that gained Churchill widespread scorn, "Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens," was not part of the investigation.

The essay and a follow-up book argued that the 2001 terrorist attacks were a response to a long history of U.S. abuses. Churchill said those killed in the World Trade Center collapse were "a technocratic corps at the very heart of America's global financial empire." He called them "little Eichmanns," referring to Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann.

Churchill wrote the piece shortly after the attacks, but it drew little notice until 2005, when a professor at Hamilton College in upstate New York called attention to it when Churchill was invited to speak there.

The Colorado regents subsequently apologized to "all Americans" for the essay and the Colorado Legislature labeled Churchill's remarks "evil and inflammatory."

Bill Owens, then governor of Colorado, said Churchill should be fired, and George Pataki, then governor of New York, called Churchill a "bigoted terrorist supporter."

School officials concluded Churchill couldn't be dismissed because he was exercising his First Amendment rights. But they launched the investigation into his research in other work.

A faculty committee and an interim chancellor had recommended Churchill be fired. When a second committee reviewed the case, three of its five members recommended suspension. The other two said he should be fired.

Churchill remained on the university payroll but has been out of the classroom since the spring of 2006. The school relieved him of teaching duties after the interim chancellor recommended he be fired.

Chancellor: School should fire outspoken professor
Attorney says Ward Churchill will appeal and will sue if University of Colorado official's recommendation is upheld. 06.27.06


U. of Wis. to allow controversial instructor to teach

Part-timer who claims U.S. government orchestrated Sept. 11 attacks will teach course on Islam. 07.11.06

College stands behind professor despite contrary views on 9/11
University of New Hampshire trustees conclude that because William Woodward presents his opinions responsibly, they aren't grounds for action against him. 09.16.06

Law-school deanship offer withdrawn from liberal legal scholar
University of California, Irvine, chancellor reportedly tells Erwin Chemerinsky, 'I knew you were liberal, but I didn't realize how controversial you'd be.' 09.15.07

Professor who backs intelligent design loses tenure appeal
'If academic freedom doesn't defend the professor with minority viewpoints, what good is it?' Guillermo Gonzalez asks after regents uphold Iowa State's decision not to grant him tenure. 02.09.08

Fired over column, Univ. of Toledo official sues
Personnel administrator's essay in Toledo Free Press online said gay rights couldn't be compared to civil rights. 12.03.08

Academic freedom

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print

Last system update: Sunday, January 25, 2009 | 04:08:26
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links