blankSpeechPressReligious LibertyAssemblyPetitionState of the First Amendment reports

frequently asked questions


Okla. House OKs adding commandments monument to Capitol

By The Associated Press
05.08.09

OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to place a monument of the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the state Capitol, setting aside concerns that it may violate constitutional principles that require government to stay neutral on religious belief.

Without debate, House members voted 83-2 for the bill on the National Day of Prayer, during which televangelist and Oklahoma native Oral Roberts addressed the state Senate. A public prayer service was conducted a short distance from the state Supreme Court chamber, and religious-themed displays and kiosks were set up in the Capitol rotunda.

"It wasn't planned," said state Rep. Mike Ritze, R-Broken Arrow, author of the Ten Commandments bill. "I think it's divine, really."

The measure authorizes installation of a 3-by-6-foot monument on the Capitol grounds that would be identical to a granite monument of the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the Texas Capitol in Austin.

Ritze, a physician, says his family will pay the estimated $10,000 cost of the project and that no state funds will be used.

"It's privately funded," he said.

The Texas monument was the focus of a landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision that found it did not violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The Court said in Van Orden v. Perry that the key to whether a display is constitutional hinges on whether there is a religious purpose behind it.

The ruling was seen by some as validation of thousands of Ten Commandments displays outside county courthouses and other public buildings around the nation if their primary purpose is to honor the nation's legal, rather than religious, traditions and if they do not promote one religious sect over another.

Ritze's measure says the Ten Commandments display will be placed near other monuments on the Capitol grounds and that it does not signify the state "favors any particular religion or denomination thereof over others."

Ritze says there is historical precedent for erecting displays of the Ten Commandments.

"The Ten Commandments basically goes back 3,500 years," he said. "We need to have something to remind us every day of where we get our history and our law."

If the monument is challenged legally, the attorney general's office or the Liberty Legal Institute, a nonprofit group based in Texas that advocates religious freedoms and First Amendment rights, will defend the display, according to the bill.

Ritze says he does not know if the monument will be the subject of a court challenge.

"Who knows," he said. "I understand their concern about it being unconstitutional." But the Supreme Court has already ruled on the issue, he said.

Ritze says he wants the monument to be placed on the Capitol grounds where it is clearly visible but that the State Capitol Preservation Commission will have the final say on its location.

"Whatever is appropriate," he said.

The measure now goes to the state Senate for final passage.


Related

Supreme Court splits on 2 Ten Commandments cases (news)
Justices rule 5-4 that Kentucky courthouse displays cross church-state line, but allow outdoor Decalogue monument on Texas Capitol grounds.
06.27.05


6th Circuit upholds Ky. Ten Commandments display (news)
Three-judge panel finds courthouse posting is constitutionally acceptable because other historic documents are also included. 12.20.05

Ten Commandments can stay on Ohio courthouse lawn (news)
Federal judge says Toledo monument honors tradition, doesn't promote specific religious belief. 04.20.06

Court OKs Okla. Ten Commandments monument (news)
Federal judge says monument outside Haskell County Courthouse can stay, rejecting arguments that it promotes Christianity at the expense of other religions. 08.20.06

Context is key to sorting out Commandments rulings (analysis)
By Tony Mauro Sharply divided Court finds older monuments likely OK; newer, sectarian-driven displays may be challenged. 06.28.05

9th Circuit finds Ten Commandments monument constitutional (analysis)
By David L. Hudson Jr. Everett, Wash., display, donated in 1959, can stay on grounds of Old City Hall. 04.01.08

Court cuts speech issue out of Summum case (analysis)
By Tony Mauro Some justices, experts express concern that establishment clause may creep back into future litigation on monuments. 02.26.09

Ten Commandments, other displays & mottos


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 | 05:10:11
 

 SEARCH  MORE
religious-liberty topics >
History of religious liberty
Religious liberty in public life
  Establishment clause
  Free-exercise clause
Religious liberty in public schools