First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

Ind. high court: State can sue over political 'robo-calls'

By The Associated Press

TERRE HAUTE, Ind. — The Indiana Supreme Court says the state can go forward with lawsuits against companies that use autodialing machines to make prerecorded telephone calls in political races.

The court ruled 5-0 yesterday to overturn a trial court's decision to dismiss a state lawsuit against American Family Voices. At issue was whether the state's 1988 law banning so-called "robo-calls" covers political calls as well as commercial and sales calls.

Attorney General Steve Carter said the court ruling would protect Indiana residents from unwanted and illegal telephone calls.

"We aren't giving any free passes to politicians who pummel Indiana with robo calls," Carter said.

Carter's office filed suit against the Washington, D.C., group in 2006 after it made calls criticizing Republican Mike Sodrel during his race against Democrat Baron Hill for southern Indiana's 9th congressional district seat.

American Family Voices claimed Indiana's telemarketing law was clearly intended to regulate only commercial speech which tries to solicit the purchase of goods or services.

The state Republican and Democratic parties, while not named in the lawsuit, filed a joint brief with the state Supreme Court, saying that automated calls used for political messages are protected free speech.

But the state Supreme Court said in State of Indiana v. American Family Voices, Inc. that "the law applies to all autodialer calls, not just consumer transaction calls with commercial messages."

The Associated Press left a message seeking comment with American Family Voices and the state Democratic Party. The Indiana Republican Party said it would have no immediate comment.

Campaigns and special-interest groups use robo-calls for purposes such as reminding voters to go to the polls, delivering endorsements or criticizing opponents. They are far cheaper than calls made by volunteers or paid personnel.

More than a dozen states have placed limits or bans on political robo-calls, according to, a project of the Pew Center on the States that tracks state legislation.


Indiana can block automated political calls

Federal judge rejects claim that ban on such phone calls is unconstitutional restraint on free speech, interstate commerce. 10.26.06

Federal appeals court tosses challenge to Ind. automated-call ban

Group had asked 7th Circuit to overturn ruling that law doesn't violate free speech, but three-judge panel rules case should be dismissed because it doesn't belong in federal court. 09.13.07

FTC to muzzle 'robocalls' further
Starting Sept. 1, telemarketers will need written permission from customers in order to make many types of pre-recorded calls. 08.28.09


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

Last system update: Wednesday, November 4, 2009 | 00:44:53
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links