|
|
|
Majority Opinion
|
Brennan, J. |
|
Concurring Opinion
|
White, J. (joined by Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) |
|
Dissenting Opinion
|
O'Connor, J. (joined by Rehnquist, C.J., & Scalia, J.) |
|
Lower Court
|
Kentucky Supreme Court |
|
Lower Court Ruling
|
First Amendment claim |
| Lawyers |
|
| Briefs |
Barry Richard and Ray Ferrero, Jr. for the Florida Bar
|
C. Rufus Pennington III for the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers (for respondent)
|
Robert MacCrate, Michael Franck and George Kuhlman for the American Bar Association (for respondent)
|
|
| Ruling - Lower Court |
|
| News |
Adler, Stephen, J., "He Can Advertise-But Only in Principle?" The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 30, 1988, p. 25
|
Cohen, Laurie P., "Direct Mail Legal Pitches Get Big Boost," Wall Street Journal, July 5, 1988, p. 23
|
Torry, Saundra, "Justices Nullify Ban on Lawyer Ads in Mail," The Washington Post, June 14, 1988, Sect. A, p. 1
|
Wermiel, Stephen, "High Court Rules Lawyers Have Right to Solicit Clients by Targeted Mailings," The Wall street Journal, June 14, 1988, p. 11
|
|
| Other |
Brody, Steven G. & Johnson, Bruce E.H., ADVERTISING AND COMMERCIAL SPEECH: A FIRST AMENDMENT GUIDE (2nd ed., 2006) §5:3
|
Chemerinsky, Erwin, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (3rd Ed.)(2006), 11.3
|
Cooper, Sonja J.M., "Comments on Lawyer Advertising Papers," 14 Law and Literature 207 (2002)
|
|
|
|
Previous capture