First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

High court steps into legal fray over 'light' cigarettes

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether tobacco companies can be sued in state courts over allegedly deceptive advertising of "light" cigarettes.

The issue before the justices is whether federal law bars such lawsuits. The Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act says states can't impose any requirements on the advertising or promotion of cigarettes.

A federal judge initially threw out a lawsuit filed by three Maine residents against Altria Group Inc. and its Philip Morris USA Inc. The lawsuit alleged that the advertising of light cigarettes was unfair and deceptive.

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, reinstated the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs said they smoked Marlboro Lights, made by Philip Morris, for at least 15 years. They contend that the company marketed the cigarettes as "light" and having "lowered tar and nicotine" despite knowing that those statements were false.

The company has research, the plaintiffs say, that shows it knew that smokers of the light cigarettes took deeper puffs and used other techniques to ensure they received as much nicotine as they would have gotten from regular cigarettes.

Philip Morris said the lawsuit was properly dismissed by the federal judge and called on the high court to resolve a conflict between appeals courts' over these sorts of lawsuits.

The case the Court agreed on Jan. 18 to hear is Altria Group v. Good, 07-562.

Justices allow lawsuits over 'light' cigarettes
In 5-4 split, high court rules smokers may use state consumer-protection laws to sue cigarette tobacco industry for way it promotes 'light' and 'low tar' brands. 12.15.08


Justices turn away tobacco companies' appeal about ads

Reynolds American, Lorillard claimed California's tough anti-smoking ads smeared their reputations. 02.21.06

Court blocks landmark ruling against tobacco industry

D.C. Circuit stays federal judge's decision that companies violated racketeering laws; order allows ad campaigns to continue that had been ruled misleading. 11.01.06

Calif. high court: Smokers can't sue over cigarette ads
Tobacco users in class-action lawsuit had claimed they took up habit as minors because of companies' marketing. 08.03.07

Tobacco ads

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

Last system update: Monday, February 8, 2010 | 16:29:56
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links