First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

N.J. lawyers barred from using some honors in ads

By The Associated Press

TRENTON, N.J. — Lawyers who practice in New Jersey should stop advertising their inclusion as "Super Lawyers" in an annual magazine supplement or their listings in a "Best Lawyers in America" directory because such designations could be potentially misleading, a New Jersey Supreme Court committee has determined.

In an opinion issued last week, the court's Committee on Attorney Advertising said such advertising violates a rule against advertisements that are "comparative in nature," The New York Times reported in its July 22 editions.

The panel also prohibited all advertising by lawyers in a supplement of The New Jersey Monthly magazine, even if they do not use the words "super lawyer," because a reader might see the same names in the ads and text and believe the label confers a recommendation.

"This simplistic use of a media-generated sound bite title clearly has the capacity to materially mislead the public," the committee said in its opinion.

The "Super Lawyers" are included in an annual advertising section of New Jersey Monthly magazine and is later published as a stand-alone issue.

The magazine and another publishing company send ballots to about 35,000 lawyers in the Garden State, asking them to nominate lawyers whose work they know and, from that group, choose who they believe are "the top 5 percent in the state."

Meanwhile, the "Best Lawyers in America" directory — a national referral guide published by Woodward/White Inc. — was included in the court committee's opinion, even though it does not contain advertising. However, it has started advertising supplements in some areas of the nation.

N.J. high court gives 'Super Lawyers' temporary reprieve
Justices put hold on ruling that attorneys can't advertise in two top-lawyer lists while publishers challenge decision on First Amendment grounds. 08.21.06


Lawyer trade publication can be distributed in Mississippi

Federal judge: American Lawyer Media's journals don't violate state law prohibiting out-of-state attorneys from advertising in the state. 01.04.03

Indiana high court scolds attorneys over TV commercials

Justices say ads violated rules of professional conduct because they implied clients would get favorable results based solely on firm's reputation with insurance companies. 08.12.03

Ohio lawyers may use client testimonials
State high court orders legal disciplinary boards to halt enforcement of prohibition in attorneys' code of conduct. 01.30.05

Justices won't let Fla. lawyers unleash 'pit-bull' ads
Fort Lauderdale attorney notes U.S. Supreme Court takes few appeals, says decision doesn't mean lower court's ruling is correct. 03.28.06

New rules require prior OK of Fla. lawyers' TV, radio ads
State high court endorses guidelines requiring attorneys to get Florida Bar approval for advertisements before airing them. 11.05.06

Attorney ads

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

Last system update: Monday, February 8, 2010 | 15:14:00
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links