First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Va. high court overturns conviction of N.C. junk e-mailer

By The Associated Press
09.12.08

RICHMOND, Va. — The Virginia Supreme Court declared the state's anti-spam law unconstitutional today and reversed the conviction of a North Carolina man once considered one of the world's most prolific spammers.

The court unanimously agreed with Jeremy Jaynes' argument that the law violates the free-speech protections of the First Amendment because it does not just restrict commercial e-mails. Most other states also have anti-spam laws, and there is a federal CAN-SPAM Act as well.

The Virginia law "is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails, including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution," Justice G. Steven Agee wrote in Jaynes v. Commonwealth of Virginia.

In 2004, Jaynes became the first person in the country to be convicted of a felony for sending unsolicited bulk e-mail. Authorities claimed Jaynes sent up to 10 million e-mails a day from his home in Raleigh, N.C. He was sentenced to nine years in prison.

Jaynes was charged in Virginia because the e-mails went through an AOL server there.

The state Supreme Court last February affirmed Jaynes' conviction on several grounds but later agreed, without explanation, to reconsider the First Amendment issue. Jaynes was allowed to argue that the law unconstitutionally infringed on political and religious speech even though all his spam was commercial.

Jaynes' attorney, Thomas Wolf, has said sending commercial spam would still be illegal under the federal CAN-SPAM Act even if Virginia's law is invalidated. However, he said the federal law would not apply to Jaynes because it was adopted after he sent the e-mails that were the basis for the state charges.


Update
Justices won't hear challenge to Va. anti-spam law
State high court had found statute unconstitutional because it prohibited political, religious and other messages in addition to commercial solicitations. 03.30.09

Previous
Divided Va. high court affirms prolific spammer's conviction
Justices rule 4-3 that state's anti-spamming law doesn't infringe on free-speech rights. 03.03.08

Related

L.A. man first in U.S. convicted under federal anti-spam law

Jeffrey Brett Goodin faces up to 101 years in federal prison after being found guilty of running 'phishing' scheme. 01.18.07

Spam


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Monday, February 8, 2010 | 16:54:19
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links