First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

Indiana curfew law gets go-ahead

By The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS — A federal judge yesterday issued a preliminary ruling upholding Indiana's curfew law, allowing the state to enforce the law until the lawsuit challenging it is decided.

U.S. District Judge John D. Tinder found that attorneys for the Indiana Civil Liberties Union failed to show "a realistic threat" that minors would be arrested on curfew violations when they were exercising their First Amendment rights.

The ICLU had sued on behalf of a Marion County parent, arguing that the state's new curfew law, passed this year by the General Assembly, violated the First Amendment because police officers could arrest anyone under 18 who is out after curfew — 11 p.m. weeknights and 1 a.m. during the weekend.

Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson praised Tinder's ruling, saying the state's curfew law is a "useful tool" that gives parents more control and involvement in their children's lives. "We are pleased with the court's decision and will use the curfew law to keep kids from committing crimes or becoming victims," Peterson said in a statement.

Kenneth Falk, the ICLU's legal director, said the group would probably appeal Tinder's ruling on the request for a preliminary injunction. Falk said the possibility of arrest, even under the infrequent circumstances described by the judge, would lead to a "pretty severe chill" on teens' willingness to exercise their First Amendment rights during curfew hours.

The state law allows youths to be out during curfew if accompanied by an adult or attending an activity involving free speech or a religious gathering, which are both protected under the First Amendment.

The law, however, made these exceptions a legal defense at trial rather than an outright prohibition against arrest.

Tinder also ruled that the curfew law did not interfere in an unconstitutional manner with parental rights. The decision to let a minor be out during curfew hours was "not central to personal dignity and autonomy," he said.

7th Circuit throws out Indiana curfew law
Rewritten law still too restrictive, federal appeals court finds, because it views minors' protected First Amendment activities as a defense after an arrest is made, rather than as providing immunity against arrest. 01.23.04

ICLU to challenge Indiana's new curfew law
Group says statute, which was passed after court struck down previous law, is too restrictive because it includes no exceptions. 07.13.01

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

Last system update: Monday, February 8, 2010 | 21:30:07
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Singsā„¢
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links