|Joe Cook, executive director of the Louisiana ACLU,
right, represented plaintiffs Georgiana Helaire, left, Jamison Helaire, second
from left, Edgar Green, and in front Tosh and Avia Bruno in a recently settled
suit against the Lafayette Parish public schools. Officials had banned the
youngsters members of the Rastafarian faith from attending
school until they conformed with the district's hair code.
A Louisiana school board and the parents of eight children kept out of
school because of their dreadlocks and head coverings have reached a tentative
agreement that will allow the children to exercise their Rastafarian beliefs
while attending the Lafayette Parish public schools.
"Absurd, asinine, stupid," are a few words that the family's
Breaux Bridge attorney, David Benoit, used to describe the dress code that has
kept the children out of school since last April. Benoit, along with
ACLU-affiliated attorneys Marjorie Esman and Eugene Thomas, had asked a federal
court to declare the school district's restrictions on head coverings and hair
length an unconstitutional infringement on the children's religious freedom and
freedom of speech.
Rastafarians Georgiana Helaire, mother of seven of the children, and
Edgar Green, father of the eighth, moved as a family to Lafayette from Oakland,
Calif., at the end of the 1999-2000 school year. However, when the parents
attempted to enroll the children who range from first to ninth grades
in public schools, officials turned them away, citing the district's
The family believes the dress code which bans headwear and
restricts "extreme hairstyles" is an affront to Rastafarian
religious requirements that adherents wear their long hair in dreadlocks.
Rastafarians also customarily wear head coverings, called "crowns,"
when in public.
The (New Orleans)
Times-Picayune reported earlier this
month that Helaire and Green had made previous attempts at working the
situation out amicably, but to no avail.
"If this were a Catholic child wanting to bring rosary beads to
school, this never would have happened," Esman told
The Times-Picayune. "If this
were a Jewish child wanting to wear a yarmulke, one wonders what the School
Board would have done."
"In light of the many unfortunate incidents that have happened in
schools recently, many school officials have rushed to these sort of measures
to prevent further misfortunes, but this is a clear case of the school and the
superintendent going overboard," said Benoit.
"The superintendent is trying to create a homogenous group
of kids with this type of initiative."
Benoit said that the Sept. 20 agreement, when ratified by the full
school board, should allow the children to keep their dreadlocks and coverings
as long as the hair and coverings can be inspected.
"The family made some minor accommodations that they weren't
happy about but that did not conflict with their religion," Benoit said.
"The important thing is that they're back in school ..., and I'm
optimistic that the remaining members of the school board will be
"It's foolish to try to fight it," board member John Earl
Guidry told the Associated Press. "The law says they have the right to
wear it. They told us there's no chance we can win."
The AP also reported that board member Ed Sam said: "The bottom
line is, those children need to be in school. We've kept them out of school
Benoit said he did not know when the school board would vote on the
agreement. The school board's attorney did not return calls for comment.