First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Maine high court: Settlement documents are public records

By The Associated Press
08.17.07

PORTLAND, Maine — Maine's highest court ruled yesterday that settlement documents between a corporation, the city of Bangor and the state Department of Environmental Protection are public records subject to disclosure requirements of the Maine Freedom of Access Act.

In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Judicial Court upheld a lower court opinion that the documents should be made public.

The case dates back to 2002, when the DEP designated a cove on the Penobscot River in Bangor as a hazardous substance site because it was contaminated with coal tar.

The city of Bangor sued Citizens Communications, a Connecticut-based company that owned the former Bangor Gas Works, which was allegedly responsible for the contamination. Claims between the city and Citizens eventually were tried in U.S. District Court, with the court ruling that both entities were partially liable for polluting the cove.

After the court's finding, the city, the DEP and Citizens held confidential negotiations to develop a remediation plan and exchanged draft consent decrees.

During negotiations this year, two other companies filed Freedom of Access requests for the consent decrees and related documents.

The state agreed to provide the documents, but Citizens filed a lawsuit in Superior Court to stop the disclosure. A Superior Court judge ruled that the documents should be made public, but stayed its judgment to allow Citizens to appeal.

The state supreme court rejected Citizens' arguments that the records should not be made public.

The opinion states that the records do not fall within the "privileged records" exception to the Freedom of Access disclosure requirements.

Justices also rejected the argument that there was an attorney-client privilege in Citizens' communications with the DEP and the city of Bangor. The court said attorney-client privilege did not protect communications between adverse parties on opposite sides of the bargaining table.

"The argument that adverse entities have shared interests merely because they are willing to negotiate a settlement is an attempt to distort the scope of the attorney-client privilege," the opinion said.


Related

Maine governor signs bill ensuring access to public information

Measure, which surfaced after statewide survey, requires law enforcement chiefs to certify that agencies have written policy on Freedom of Access requests. 05.20.03

Author can't get records from review of child-murder case

Divided Maine high court says lawyers investigating at behest of attorney general were acting as private citizens, not subject to requirements of state open-records act. 06.20.08

Recent FOI victories: Judges reject baseless secrecy
By Douglas Lee In several states, government efforts to withhold public information have failed. 08.28.07

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | 02:52:27
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links