frequently asked questionscases & resources
Overview >
By Dave Roland
Contributing writer

Colleges and universities, as the training ground of new generations of thinkers, are a common source of controversy concerning what should be taught. Administrators at some public institutions of higher learning, in an effort to promote the values of diversity and equality, have in some cases tried to persuade professors to refrain from voicing certain viewpoints — even from pursuing certain fields of study — that could be seen as working against those ideals.

“Academic freedom,” as the phrase is most commonly used, describes the right of teachers to conduct their classrooms and studies in the way that they believe to be most consistent with a pursuit of truth. Though this concept is not explicitly addressed in the First Amendment, it has been adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court as a freedom protected alongside the other First Amendment values. In a 1967 case, Keyishian v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, the Court declared that academic freedom was a “transcendent value” entitled to the protection of the First Amendment.

While noting that “time, place and manner” restrictions may be placed on First Amendment rights, the Court in its 1972 decision Healy v. James stated that “the precedents … leave no room for the view that, because of the acknowledged need for order, First Amendment protections should apply with less force on college campuses than in the community at large.”

Despite the Supreme Court’s support for academic freedom, administrators at some public colleges and universities continue to try to stop faculty from researching certain areas, publishing their findings, or making unpopular statements. Recent years have seen attempts to prevent studies of racial difference and employment policy at the University of Delaware and the history of homosexual communities in the Pacific Northwest at Idaho State University, and to punish a creative writing professor in Alaska for her exploration of child sexual abuse. Cases arising out of school-initiated censorship are almost invariably settled or decided against the school.

Another type of content-based censorship has also occurred. Some state legislatures have tried to silence professors even when colleges have not. In Missouri, a professor’s article on pedophilia led the state Legislature to cut $100,000 from the University of Missouri at Kansas City budget. Such actions are almost invariably resolved in favor of the professors. As the Supreme Court held in its 1957 decision Sweezy v. New Hampshire that “for society’s good … [p]olitical power must abstain from intrusion” into “the intellectual life of the university.”

Generally, professors may research or speak on any question that is of “public concern” without fear of official reprisal. This principle is not without uncertainty, however. Academic freedom will not cover personal attacks, criticisms or comments that excessively hamper the mission of the university, or expression that does not specifically address a public concern.

Since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, some schools have challenged the idea that academic freedom should protect the right of a professor to voice support for those who would “bomb the Pentagon,” to use the school’s resources in advancing pro-war opinions, or to convene a forum to criticize American foreign policy as the cause of the attacks. Only time will tell how the courts will deal with the unusual challenges presented by the threat of terrorism.

Finally, it is important to remember that private universities are governed by a different set of rules than their publicly funded counterparts. Because private schools are not under the control of the government, they are not legally required to assure the same liberties to their administrators, faculty or students. The discussion in this section is applicable only to state-run institutions.


N.D. lawmaker wants investigation into Ten Commandments suit

State legislator objects to University of North Dakota's use of public funds for federal lawsuit against city of Fargo. 08.26.03

Colorado educators worry academic bill of rights hurts free speech
Rules to protect conservative views on state campuses have led to death threats, critics argue; Republicans counter saying classroom conservatives still being harassed. 09.10.04

N.C. college instructor suspended for showing Moore's film
Community college says showing only 'Fahrenheit 9/11' was too one-sided to foster critical thinking. 11.27.04

University of Colorado explores dismissing outspoken professor
Interim chancellor launches 30-day review of Ward Churchill's speeches, writings to determine if his comments about 9/11 victims overstepped boundaries of academic freedom. 02.04.05

Arkansas university campus disinvites political writer
Faculty at different Arkansas State University campus seeks to invite David Corn there to uphold academic freedom. 04.21.05

Free-speech compromise reached on Ohio academic freedom
Legislature would defer passing academic 'bill of rights' in favor of resolution by state higher ed council. 09.15.05

Faculty committee finds fault with controversial professor
University of Colorado panel says Ward Churchill repeatedly fabricated research, plagiarized others' work, veered from basic principles of scholarship. 05.20.06

U. of Wis. to allow controversial instructor to teach
Part-timer who claims U.S. government orchestrated Sept. 11 attacks will teach course on Islam. 07.11.06

Beleaguered U. of Colo. professor vows to fight dismissal
Attorney for Ward Churchill says client was targeted for remarks about Sept. 11 victims; First Amendment lawsuit to be filed today. 07.25.07

2nd Circuit: Military-recruiting law doesn't violate academic freedom
Yale Law School, which objects to Pentagon's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy, says it will end ban on military recruiters after losing case. 09.20.07

Jury: U. of Colo. wrongly fired professor
Judge will decide whether Ward Churchill gets back his job as tenured professor of ethnic studies. 04.03.09

University fires outspoken coastal scientist
Ivor van Heerden, who led state's independent Team Louisiana investigation into Hurricane Katrina levee failures, claims Louisiana State University officials are trying to silence him. 04.13.09

University clears professor who made Holocaust-Gaza comparison
UC-Santa Barbara ends probe of William Robinson, who sent e-mail to class criticizing Israel's treatment of Palestinians, after panel finds no 'probable cause to undertake disciplinary action.' 06.26.09

U. of Colo. professor loses bid to reclaim job
Denver district judge vacates jury's decision that found firing of Ward Churchill was politically motivated. 07.08.09

Journalism prof claims university violated free speech
David Demers' federal lawsuit claims Washington State administrators punished him for proposing plan to improve Edward R. Murrow College of Communication. 11.02.09

Reflections by an academic-freedom pioneer
By David L. Hudson Jr. Forty years ago Harry Keyishian was lead plaintiff in Supreme Court case that established academic freedom as protected value. 09.26.07

print this   Print

Last system update: Thursday, February 4, 2010 | 16:17:01
free speech on public college campuses issues >
Hate speech & campus speech codes
Academic freedom
Free-speech zones
Student newspapers & yearbooks
Student fees & clubs
Art controversies
Sexual harassment
Campus speakers
FOI on campus
Fan profanity