First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

High court rejects broadcasters' latest request for same-day audio

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — For the first time in four years, the Supreme Court has gone an entire term without granting the quick release of audio recordings of high-profile arguments.

The Court said yesterday it had rejected a request from four broadcasters for the same-day audio in next week’s arguments in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, an important First Amendment case that pits a Christian campus organization against the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law.

With television cameras and reporters’ tape recorders barred from the Court, the availability of audio provides the public with a chance to hear the justices at work.

The last time the Court provided audio the same day as an argument was in September in a key case about limits on campaign spending by corporations and labor unions. The first time was in Bush v. Gore, the case that helped settle the 2000 presidential election.

Since the current term began in October, the justices have turned down seven requests for the audio, including one for audio of a March 2 argument over the reach of the constitutional right to own guns, according to statistics compiled by the C-SPAN cable network.

C-SPAN, ABC, CNN and Fox jointly asked for audio in the upcoming case. There are no requests for the other seven cases being argued in April, the last argument session this term.

The Court typically doesn’t explain its actions, but there is some thought that releasing the audio more frequently would start the Court down the slippery slope toward cameras in the courtroom.

In September, a questioner at a University of Michigan law school event asked Chief Justice John Roberts why audio was not made available more often.

“At the end of the day, it’s not our job to educate,” Roberts said. “It’s our job to decide cases.”

Meanwhile, when Justices Stephen Breyer and Clarence Thomas appear before a House Appropriations subcommittee today, C-SPAN cameras will be there. And if past sessions are any guide, lawmakers will ask the justices about televising their proceedings the same way Congress does.

That won’t happen anytime soon, with Thomas, Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Anthony Kennedy among those most opposed to cameras at the Supreme Court.

The newest justice, Sonia Sotomayor, suggested at her Senate confirmation hearing last year that she would try to soften the opposition. Judge Diane Wood, a contender for the seat that will become open when Justice John Paul Stevens retires this summer, recently told a Washington audience that she too is open to cameras. “I personally don’t think it would be the end of the world,” Wood said, adding that other judges on her federal appeals court in Chicago disagree.


Not coming soon to the Supreme Court: TV cameras

C-SPAN televises recent arguments in 2nd Circuit case, but high court still remains no-broadcast zone. 12.13.08

Federal courts to provide audio recordings of some trials

Judicial Conference of the United States, which sets federal court policies, says its actions will improve public access. 03.17.10

Will cameras ever roll in high court?
By Tony Mauro As famously camera-shy Justice Souter exits, experts debate potential for broadcast access. 05.12.09

Cameras in Court may get boost
By Tony Mauro Nominee says that if confirmed, she'd wait for right time to discuss issue with colleagues.
  • First Amendment record 07.16.09

    Justices step directly into cameras-in-court debate
    By Tony Mauro Plan to broadcast gay-marriage trial over Internet prompts speedy reaction from high court. 01.12.10

    News summary page
    View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

    Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 10:00:05
    About this site
    About the First Amendment
    About the First Amendment Center
    How to contribute
    First Amendment programs
    State of the First Amendment

    Religious liberty in public schools
    First Reports
    Supreme Court
    First Amendment publications
    First Amendment Center history
    Freedom Sings™
    First Amendment

    Congressional Research Service reports
    Guest editorials
    FOI material
    The First Amendment

    Lesson plans
    Contact us
    Privacy statement
    Related links