First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
Commentary
 
print this   Print         E-mail this article  E-mail this article

Will federal government become more open? Jury still out
Inside the First Amendment

By Gene Policinski
First Amendment Center vice president/executive director
12.13.09

We’re either on the verge of a new era in transparency in the federal government — or we’re not.

On just his first full day in office, Jan. 21, President Barack Obama pledged that the public would have more and easier access to official records and information in his presidency, saying federal agencies should live up to the Freedom of Information Act by presuming records open unless there’s good reason to close them.

On Dec. 8, the administration issued a directive that each federal department and Cabinet-level agency must post online within 45 days at least three new sets of high-interest information not previously available, and must create a Web page within 60 days outlining how it intends to live up to open-government regulations. Within 120 days, each must have an open-government plan completed and available to the public for comment.

The plan — if carried out — will go a long way toward improving the thus-far lukewarm rating Obama has gotten from freedom of information advocates.

On the plus side of the FOI ledger, even before the latest directive, the administration developed a Web-based disclosure of the details of the government’s massive economic stimulus package (www.recovery.gov). And Obama relaxed rules that had blocked news coverage of the return to the U.S. of the remains of military service members killed overseas, rightly leaving it up to family members to decide whether to allow it.

On the negative side, freedom of information advocates note there initially was no disclosure of the details of the so-called Cash for Clunkers program; when records were finally released, they showed the program was much less successful than hoped in taking gas-guzzling old cars off the road. It took the threat of a lawsuit to obtain the names of outside participants in the White House discussions leading up to Obama’s massive health-insurance reform package — reminiscent of Bush administration stonewalling on discussions about oil-drilling policy. And the administration has continued the Bush administration’s opposition to full disclosure on certain policies regarding the war on terrorism, including the jailing of suspected terrorists overseas.

Just last week, 11 journalism organizations demanded that the Food and Drug Administration end its requirement that journalists and all FDA employees obtain an official OK before an interview, and that a public information officer be present.

For watchdog groups on freedom of information issues, there is a wait-and-see attitude about the new Obama initiative. They recall that in 2007, President George W. Bush issued a Freedom of Information order on openness, and that some agencies simply failed to live up to it. Others note that the “new” data to be posted may simply be information already available in one format, but then posted in another.

The real challenge ahead is reversing decades of increasing secrecy across a range of local, state and federal agencies, and bureaucratic roadblocks to obtaining information under existing “sunshine” laws. In its 2009 report card on federal practices, the group OpenTheGovernment.org reported a slight decrease in the creation of official secrets in the last year of the Bush administration, but it was not able to track a corresponding rise in public disclosures. Long-term, the trend — through Democratic and Republican administrations alike, for decades — has been to provide less information to citizens, particularly in areas involving national security.

Change to more-open practices doesn’t come easily to bureaucrats. A Dec. 7 federal “open government” meeting in Washington, D.C., for employees working in freedom of information areas, was — of  all things — closed to the public. The rationale was the same as so often is given for excluding citizens: Organizers “wanted government employees to be able to speak candidly.”

Apart from the fact that these were government employees meeting in a public building to discuss public business, those organizers ought to have considered this candid observation, offered by one high administration official: “Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.”

A ringing endorsement indeed for transparency and disclosure – and a direct quote from President Obama’s Jan. 21 promise of a “new era of openness.”

Gene Policinski is vice president and executive director of the First Amendment Center, 555 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D.C., 20001. Web: www.firstamendmentcenter.org. E-mail: gpolicinski@fac.org.


Related

AP chief: Obama's transparency message hasn't 'reached the street'

Senate holds hearing to review work by new office charged with reviewing compliance with open-government laws, mediating disputes with public. 09.30.09

Federal workshop on openness closed to the public

Official in charge says government employees need to speak candidly at today's meeting. 12.07.09

White House tells agencies to release data collections

Open-government advocates praise order that each federal department must publish at least three new sets of 'high value' information by end of January. 12.09.09

C-SPAN: Health-care talks should be televised
As candidate, President Obama promised he would broadcast legislative deliberations on C-SPAN 'so that the American people can see what the choices are.' 01.05.10

AIG bailout secrecy could mean Geithner testifies
Congressional Republicans call for hearings into e-mails showing that Federal Reserve suppressed details about deals that allowed big banks to collect billions in bailout. 01.09.10

Government posting wealth of info on Internet
Obama administration issued directive last month that each Cabinet-level agency must release three collections of 'high-value' data. 01.22.10

Obama keeps reporters away from Dalai Lama meeting
White House offers in-house photo, but some services refuse to distribute it because they say press access would have been possible. 02.19.10

White House reveals few details of Bush cyber plan
Electronic Privacy Information Center, which filed federal lawsuit last month seeking release of computer security document, says disclosure is good first step. 03.03.10

Audit: Agencies lag in following Obama's openness order
National Security Archive finds a decidedly mixed record in review of how 90 agencies responded to president's directives to open more records. 03.15.10

AP review: Use of FOIA exemptions rose in 2009
Study of reports filed by 17 federal agencies finds that despite president's promise of more openness, use of legal exemptions to keep records secret increased during last fiscal year. 03.16.10

Transparency alone won't cure all that ails us
By Douglas Lee Watchdogs must be vigilant and government officials must be willing to open their own agencies to the sunlight and act on what they find. 03.05.10

Analysis/Commentary summary page
View the latest analysis and commentary throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 13:11:27
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links