blankSpeechPressReligious LibertyAssemblyPetitionState of the First Amendment reports

frequently asked questions


print this   Print

Obama administration to appeal ruling against prayer day

By The Associated Press
04.23.10

The Obama administration will appeal a court decision that found the National Day of Prayer unconstitutional, the Justice Department said yesterday.

U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb in Madison, Wis., ruled last week that the National Day of Prayer that Congress established 58 years ago amounted to a call for religious action.

In a notice filed yesterday, the Justice Department said it would challenge the decision in the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago. The notice came after about two dozen members of Congress condemned the ruling and pressed for an appeal.

The case was brought by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a Madison-based group of atheists and agnostics who argue the National Day of Prayer violates the separation of church and state. Its co-president Annie Laurie Gaylor, said she was disappointed in the decision to appeal.

"I would have expected something better from a legal scholar," she said, referring to President Barack Obama's background as a law professor.

The administration had argued the law simply acknowledges the role of religion in the United States.

Congress established the day in 1952 and in 1988 set the first Thursday in May as the day for presidents to issue proclamations asking Americans to pray. An Obama spokesman has said the president plans to issue a proclamation for the upcoming prayer day, May 6. Many other state and local officials typically follow suit.

The Justice Department signaled it would appeal not only Crabb's decision on the merits of the case but also her ruling last month that the defendants had the standing to bring the lawsuit in the first place.

Crabb ruled atheists and agnostics could sue because they were injured by being made to feel like outsiders on the National Day of Prayer. She rejected the administration's argument that "psychological harm" wasn't enough to support a lawsuit.

In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled members of the Freedom From Religion Foundation did not have standing to sue over a Bush administration initiative that helped religious charities win government contracts.

Also yesterday, the Army said evangelist Franklin Graham's invitation to speak at a Pentagon National Day of Prayer event had been rescinded because his comments about Islam were inappropriate.

Graham, the son famed evangelist Billy Graham, in 2001 described Islam as evil. More recently, he has said he finds Islam offensive and wants Muslims to know that Jesus Christ died for their sins.

Army spokesman Col. Tom Collins said Graham's remarks were "not appropriate."

"We're an all-inclusive military," Collins said. "We honor all faiths. ... Our message to our service and civilian work force is about the need for diversity and appreciation of all faiths."

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation had raised the objection to Graham's appearance, citing his past remarks about Islam.

The decision suggests a growing sensitivity in recent years among senior Pentagon officials to the divide between the U.S. military and Muslims. Graham attended a Pentagon prayer service in 2003, despite objections by Muslim groups.

Graham said he regretted that the Army felt its decision was necessary. In a statement, he said he would continue to pray for the troops to "give them guidance, wisdom and protection as they serve this great country."

Nihad Awad, national executive director of Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Graham's invitation would have sent "entirely the wrong message" at a time when troops are stationed in Muslim nations.


Previous
Congressmen condemn ruling against National Day of Prayer
Meanwhile, Pentagon considers disinviting evangelist Franklin Graham to speak because of his criticisms of Muslim faith. 04.22.10

Related

Federal judge rules Day of Prayer unconstitutional (news)
District Judge Barbara Crabb writes that government can no more enact laws supporting prayer than it can encourage fasting during Ramadan, attending a synagogue or practicing magic. 04.16.10

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 11:54:00
 

 SEARCH  MORE
religious-liberty topics >
History of religious liberty
Religious liberty in public life
  Establishment clause
  Free-exercise clause
Religious liberty in public schools