First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
FCC v. League of Women Voters of California (docket #: 82-912) (1984)  [Findlaw]

Argument Date 01/16/1984
Decided 7/2/1984
Supreme Court Vote 5-4
IssueWhether Section 399 of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, as amended by the Public Broadcasting Amendments Act of 1981, which forbids any "non-commercial educational broadcasting station which receives a grant from the Corporation" to "engage in editorializing," violate the First Amendment.
Majority Opinion Brennan, J.
Dissenting Opinion Rehnquist, J. (joined by Burger, C.J. & White, J.), Stevens, J.
Oral Arguments Oral Arguments (Oyez)  [Oyez]
For Petitioner
Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

For Respondent
Frederic D. Woocher

"Broadcasters Seek End to Regulation," New York Times, February 9, 1984, sect. C, p. 30
"Department of Justice and Broadcasters Tangle in Supreme Court Over Editorializing," Communications Daily, January 17, 1984, p. 4
"Editorial Ruling Elates Public Stations," Los Angeles Times, July 3, 1984, sect. E, p. 1
"High Court Rules for Public TV," Washington Post, July 3, 1984, sect. A, p. 1
"Alito as government lawyer: '84 broadcast-regulation case"

"Partisan Speech on the Public Air," New York Times, July 26, 1984, sect. A, p. 22
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links