First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Supreme Court turns away appeal from anti-abortion activists

By The Associated Press
06.27.03

Editor’s note: On Sept. 6, 2005, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reduced the punitive damages awarded in the case from $108 million to about $4.7 million. The panel’s unanimous decision was based on a 2003 Supreme Court ruling generally limiting punitive damages to no more than nine times the amount of damages awarded to compensate for monetary losses. An attorney for the defendants said the damages should be reduced further and that he was considering asking the court to reconsider.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court turned back an appeal today from anti-abortion protesters facing a multimillion dollar judgment for targeting clinic doctors with "wanted" posters.

The Court had been asked to give free-speech protection to the activists, but the Bush administration discouraged justices from taking the case, American Coalition of Life Activists v. Planned Parenthood.

Physicians sued, claiming they feared for their lives after being listed on a round of Old West-style wanted posters and having their personal information put on the Nuremberg Files Web site. Three doctors who had been featured on posters were killed.

The American Coalition of Life Activists and others were sued under a racketeering law and the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which makes it illegal to incite violence and threaten doctors who perform abortions.

The activists were ordered to pay $108 million in punitive damages and $12 million in compensatory damages. An appeals court told the judge in the case to reduce the punitive damages, and the matter is pending.

The case divided the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that protesters tried to intimidate doctors and clinic staff. Appeals court judges who disagreed with that decision said the posters were free speech.

Edward White III, the attorney for the anti-abortion protesters, said in court filings that if the decision were allowed to stand, "political speakers accused of threats will be at the mercy of local juries, whose crushing verdicts will receive minimal First Amendment scrutiny."

Planned Parenthood attorney Maria Vullo told the Supreme Court that the organizers of the campaign "were fully aware of the poster/murder pattern and the fear in its wake — and they capitalized upon it to intimidate the living physicians by threats of bodily injury."


Update
Last appeal refused in 'wanted' poster case
9th Circuit decision, which ordered anti-abortion activists to pay nearly $5 million in damages, stands. 05.02.06

Previous
White House asks high court to stay out of abortion-protest case
Administration says justices should let stand ruling against abortion foes for listing personal data about abortion-clinic employees on Web, posters. 06.03.03

Related

True threats


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 15:40:26
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links