First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Iowa justices: Newspapers can be sued for 'defamation by implication'

By The Associated Press,
First Amendment Center Online staff
03.14.07

DES MOINES, Iowa — Newspapers can be sued for “defamation by implication” even if the comments in question are true, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled late last week.

The high court on March 9 ordered a trial on one count of a lawsuit filed by a former columnist against a newspaper in Ames, ruling that statements the newspaper made about the columnist could be considered defamatory.

In its decision, the court said both private and public figures can be defamed if true statements are presented in a manner that carries false implications.

“We now expressly adopt the principle of defamation by implication. Otherwise, by a careful choice of words in juxtaposition of statements in a publication, a potential defendant may make statements that are true yet just as damaging as if they were actually false,” the court said in its ruling in Stevens v. Iowa Newspapers.

The lawsuit stems from a dispute in 2002, when the Ames Tribune refused to print a sports column submitted by Todd Stevens, a freelance writer. The column criticized an outgoing Iowa State University athletic official, and newspaper editors were troubled by its negative comments that they thought also left questions about the paper’s coverage.

Stevens wrote another version of the column, but newspaper editors still declined to publish it. Stevens read the column on a local radio sports show and told an editor he would stop writing his column.

Editors agreed to publish a “farewell” column, and the column ran June 10, 2002, alongside a column written by the sports editor. Stevens claimed in his lawsuit that the editor’s column defamed him, in part because it said he rarely attended events about which he wrote.

The Supreme Court dismissed several claims in the lawsuit but sent the case back for trial on the claim about Stevens’ attendance at events. The court noted that although it was true that Stevens rarely attended events, it is common for sports columnists to write about events without seeing them in person.

We “conclude that a reasonable jury could find by clear and convincing evidence that this statement was false in its implication and was made with reckless disregard for the truth,” the high court said.

Tribune Publisher Joseph Craig said newspaper officials were happy that most of the lawsuit was dismissed.

“We’re pretty happy that the court ruled in our favor on two of the three counts and disappointed in the third,” said Craig. “Beyond that we just have to give our attorneys time to look at the decision and get back with us.”


Related

Jury: New York Times shouldn't pay damages in defamation case

Federal jurors say although pharmaceutical company was defamed when newspaper used its Web site to illustrate story on illegal conduct, it suffered no harm. 03.30.04

6th Circuit upholds dismissal of libel suit against Michael Moore

James Nichols, brother of Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols, had accused filmmaker of defaming him in 'Bowling for Columbine.' 02.21.07

Libel & defamation


News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 16:24:18
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links