First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

Federal judge finds man in contempt in cybersquatting case

By The Associated Press

ST. PAUL, Minn. — An anti-abortion activist who has registered Web site addresses derived from the name of The Washington Post and other well-known companies said he would go to jail rather than give them up.

The registered domain names include “” and “the”

William Purdy, 52, of South St. Paul, uses the domain names to direct Internet surfers to anti-abortion Web pages.

Yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge Ann Montgomery found Purdy in contempt of her order last July that he give up registering domain names that take advantage of well-known trademarks such as The Washington Post, McDonald’s, Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola to direct Web surfers to anti-abortion sites.

Domain names are the common-language addresses for Web sites. Bitter battles often break out over who gets to use names belonging to companies, products or celebrities.

Thomas Olson, an attorney for the corporations, complained that since that order, Purdy has registered new names such as “” and “” that direct Internet users to Web sites that feature photos of what purport to be aborted fetuses. Purdy had previously been ordered to surrender names such as “” and “” that did the same thing.

“He’s continuing to flout the order right now, as we sit in this court,” Olson said.

But Purdy and his attorney, Douglas Altman, argued that the judge’s order was too vague and didn’t give Purdy enough guidance on what was permissible. Purdy said he would comply with a judge’s ruling on what sites he couldn’t register but complained that the judge was trying to take away his rights of free speech.

Montgomery denied a motion Purdy made last fall for further clarification of her order, saying it was clear enough. She said she would give Purdy one last chance to comply by a Feb. 4 hearing or be arrested.

“I’m going to jail,” Purdy said.

Minnesota abortion foe must shutter Web sites
Federal judge issues temporary restraining order requested by several large corporations seeking to protect their trademarks. 07.24.02



News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 16:49:31
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links